Skip to content

Conversation

@candita
Copy link
Contributor

@candita candita commented May 20, 2021

PR #25406 changed ExternalTrafficPolicy from Cluster to Local to try to optimize network performance. Unfortunately, Local will drop traffic instead of rerouting it. For this test we need to use Cluster.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 20, 2021

@candita: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929396, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lihongan

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1929396: Revert part of PR #25406 - use ExternalTrafficPolicyCluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from lihongan, mrogers950 and soltysh May 20, 2021 18:40
@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 21, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 21, 2021

@candita: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929396, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lihongan

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 21, 2021

STEP: ensuring all cluster operators are stable
May 20 19:32:43.350: FAIL: Some cluster operators are not ready: machine-config (Upgradeable=False PoolUpdating: One or more machine config pools are updating, please see oc get mcp for further details)
/retest

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 21, 2021

[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by not timing out

/test e2e-gcp

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 22, 2021

/test e2e-aws-disruptive

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented May 24, 2021

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: candita, knobunc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 24, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

10 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 25, 2021

error: invalid configuration: [context was not found for specified context: policy-can-i/api-ci-op-sx6s3h1m-2a78c-origin-ci-int-gce-dev-rhcloud-com:6443/storage-adm2, cluster has no server defined]

/retest e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

@candita: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-image-registry
  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-multitenant
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-upgrade
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-builds
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
  • /test e2e-gcp-image-ecosystem
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-serial
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test images
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-deps
  • /test extended_gssapi
  • /test extended_ldap_groups
  • /test extended_networking

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-disruptive
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-disruptive
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

error: invalid configuration: [context was not found for specified context: policy-can-i/api-ci-op-sx6s3h1m-2a78c-origin-ci-int-gce-dev-rhcloud-com:6443/storage-adm2, cluster has no server defined]

/retest e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 25, 2021

/test e2e-gcp

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 26, 2021

Message: "the server has received too many requests and has asked us to try again later (get builds.build.openshift.io)",

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented May 26, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2021

@smarterclayton: Overrode contexts on behalf of smarterclayton: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@candita
Copy link
Contributor Author

candita commented May 27, 2021

Failure due to: e2e-gcp-gather-must-gather container test

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 58b1008 into openshift:master May 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 27, 2021

@candita: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1929396 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1929396: Revert part of PR #25406 - use ExternalTrafficPolicyCluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants