[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry #27758

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T12:49:58Z

These three commits were part of #27636 and #27651 which fixed a problem where we stopped collecting disruption data for these two backends in CI testing. Unfortunately the fix was not backported to 4.12 when we discovered it. This corrects that.

TRT-825

Discovered that we are getting no data for image registry since Dec 7th due to PR openshift#27574 which shut off the entire monitor if we have less than the required 100 runs to appear in the file of allowances to enforce. I guess at this time, we did not have enough runs with image registry for 4.13. (which is unusual) Skip the test, but let the monitor run.

Previous attempt did not work, as we were still bypassing FrameworkEventIntervals() which is needed to add the test summary, which eventually results in the AdditionalEvents json files in artifacts, which are then merged into the overall events and disruption data files. Without calling it, we still get no disruption data uploaded. Move the nil check into the ExpectNoDisruption function, and allow FrameworkEventIntervals to run as it should.

openshift-merge-robot · 2023-02-28T12:50:07Z

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:50:34Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

backport disrupt gathering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-02-28T12:50:47Z

@dgoodwin: No Jira issue with key OCPBUGS-8025 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Switch imports to ginkgo v2

Switch to go-ldap/v3

Add newlines to SimultaneousPodIPController

Adapt to v2 by migrating use of extensions/table package

Adapt to v2 by migrating use of config.GinkgoConfig to ginkgo.GinkgoConfiguration()

Adopt to v2 by migrating from CurrentGinkgoTestDescription() to CurrentSpecReport()

Remove dead code - ExecuteTest

Remove dead code - setTestExclusion

Use rhel-8-release-golang-1.19-openshift-4.12 builder

Update dependencies

React to k8s 1.25 changes

Update ETCD storage test alpha versions

Update test images

Add registry.k8s.io/pause:3.8

ginkgo v2 adaptation

Drop [Suite:openshift/registry/serial] from Image signature worklow tests

Update gofmt with golang 1.19

Fix TestBackendSampler_checkConnection unit test

make update

Switch from waiting for running pod to wait for a completed pod in image tests

Do not panic when test annotation is not found

Only invoke BuildTree one time

Update ginkgo dependency

Skip broken [sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem] tests

Revert "Merge pull request Merge upgrade and conformance alert backstop tests #27533 from dgoodwin/merge-alert-backstops"

OCPBUGS-3694: [4.12] Drop template.openshift.io apigroup dependency (OCPBUGS-3694: [4.12] Drop template.openshift.io apigroup dependency #27546)

Fix flake reporting for certain tests.

Bump kubernetes to latest release-4.12

Unskip service session affinity tests

Nginx 1.18 images will reach EOL in November 2022

Skip disruption test if no historical data

Add Kuryr exception to "pods should successfully create sandboxes" test

update git repo paths to match must-gather and inspect

add user in log for each resourcewatch modification

add yaml suffix for resource watch

handle managers keys that are for subresources

simplify the resource watch controller down to the active components

avoid unintended updates for resourcewatch git repo

shell out to git for resource-watch

remove unncessary vendoring

Use cluster network MTU for bond interfaces

upgrade/adminack: guarantee one admin ack check post-upgrade

upgrade/adminack: optimize the post-upgrade check

Fix intervalcreation incorrect year unit test bug

upgrade/adminack: simplify polling and unblock "guaranteed" post-upgrade check

upgrade/adminack: wait up to 4m until gate propagates to upgradeable

extended: security: do not explicitly set api audience on token request

OCPBUGS-1125: remove reference to old guard pods

Fix missing disruption uploads.

Fix missing disruption data again.

Add logging for the job type we determined

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:51:17Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:51:47Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/OWNERS~~ [dgoodwin]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-02-28T12:51:50Z

@dgoodwin: No Jira issue with key OCPBUGS-8025 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

These three commits were part of #27636 and #27651 which fixed a problem where we stopped collecting disruption data for these two backends in CI testing. Unfortunately the fix was not backported to 4.12 when we discovered it. This corrects that.

TRT-825

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:51:51Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-02-28T12:51:54Z

@dgoodwin: No Jira issue with key OCPBUGS-8025 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

These three commits were part of #27636 and #27651 which fixed a problem where we stopped collecting disruption data for these two backends in CI testing. Unfortunately the fix was not backported to 4.12 when we discovered it. This corrects that.

TRT-825

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:51:55Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:52:08Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T12:52:11Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:52:14Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:53:32Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T12:53:34Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:53:38Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T12:54:36Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:54:52Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:54:54Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:55:31Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-02-28T12:55:32Z

@dgoodwin: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8024, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.12.z" version, but no target version was set
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8024 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.13.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

These three commits were part of #27636 and #27651 which fixed a problem where we stopped collecting disruption data for these two backends in CI testing. Unfortunately the fix was not backported to 4.12 when we discovered it. This corrects that.

TRT-825

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T12:55:34Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T12:55:40Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:04:31Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T13:04:45Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:04:49Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:08:43Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T13:08:47Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:08:50Z

@dgoodwin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dgoodwin · 2023-02-28T13:11:38Z

/close

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:12:06Z

@dgoodwin: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-02-28T13:12:08Z

@dgoodwin: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8024. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

These three commits were part of #27636 and #27651 which fixed a problem where we stopped collecting disruption data for these two backends in CI testing. Unfortunately the fix was not backported to 4.12 when we discovered it. This corrects that.

TRT-825

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2023-02-28T13:13:28Z

@dgoodwin: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node`
ci/prow/unit	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test unit`
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd`
ci/prow/lint	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test lint`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling`
ci/prow/verify-deps	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test verify-deps`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-csi`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-openstack-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-csi`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-builds	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds`
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade`
ci/prow/verify	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test verify`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade`
ci/prow/images	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test images`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade	`ccca62d`	link	true	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade`
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	`ccca62d`	link	false	`/test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

dgoodwin added 3 commits February 28, 2023 08:48

Add logging for the job type we determined

ccca62d

openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the base branch from master to release-4.12 February 28, 2023 12:50

dgoodwin changed the title ~~backport disrupt gathering~~ OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and soltysh February 28, 2023 12:51

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ Bug OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~Bug OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8025: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 28, 2023

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 28, 2023

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

dgoodwin changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry~~ [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry Feb 28, 2023

openshift-ci bot closed this Feb 28, 2023

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry #27758

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-8024: Backport fixes to resume gathering CI disruption data for SLB and image registry #27758

Uh oh!

Conversation

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

dgoodwin commented Feb 28, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading