OPRUN-4056: [OLMv1] Remove Preflight checks since those were migrated to OTE#30074
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4056 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
camilamacedo86
changed the title
|
/hold Until: openshift/operator-framework-operator-controller#423 get merged |
camilamacedo86
changed the title
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
/hold |
camilamacedo86
force-pushed
the
remove-olmv1-preflight
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a1fbde5 to
ba0d415
Compare
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: ba0d415
|
camilamacedo86
force-pushed
the
remove-olmv1-preflight
branch
from
ba0d415 to
549904b
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4056 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
camilamacedo86
changed the title
|
/retest-required |
|
/hold cancel |
openshift-ci
Bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4056 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
anik120
left a comment
anik120
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
I see openshift/operator-framework-operator-controller#423 merged 19 hours ago.
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, camilamacedo86, smg247, tmshort The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
approved
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn |
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn |
|
/retest-required |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
@camilamacedo86: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 549904b
|
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
@smg247: Overrode contexts on behalf of smg247: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/acknowledge-critical-fixes-only While this isn’t a critical fix from the user’s perspective, keeping the same tests in both OTE and ocp/origin makes debugging and troubleshooting harder in the long run. Now that everything has been migrated, we should clean up to ensure consistency for 4.20. All tests are already in OTE. |
|
/acknowledge-critical-fixes-only |
1 similar comment
|
/acknowledge-critical-fixes-only |
|
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
acknowledge-critical-fixes-only
openshift-merge-bot
Bot
merged commit e7b4f7e
into
openshift:main
5 participants
The tests were migrating in: operator-framework-operator-controller/pull/423
They are in Sippy: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/component_readiness/capability?baseEndTime=2025-06-17%2023%3A59%3A59&baseRelease=4.19&baseStartTime=2025-05-18%2000%3A00%3A00&capability=OCPFeatureGate%3ANewOLMPreflightPermissionChecks&columnGroupBy=Architecture%2CNetwork%2CPlatform%2CTopology&component=OLM&confidence=95&dbGroupBy=Platform%2CArchitecture%2CNetwork%2CTopology%2CFeatureSet%2CUpgrade%2CSuite%2CInstaller&flakeAsFailure=false&ignoreDisruption=true&ignoreMissing=false&includeMultiReleaseAnalysis=true&includeVariant=Architecture%3Aamd64&includeVariant=CGroupMode%3Av2&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Acrun&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Arunc&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Adefault&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Atechpreview&includeVariant=Installer%3Ahypershift&includeVariant=Installer%3Aipi&includeVariant=Installer%3Aupi&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ablocking&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ainforming&includeVariant=JobTier%3Astandard&includeVariant=LayeredProduct%3Anone&includeVariant=LayeredProduct%3Avirt&includeVariant=Network%3Aovn&includeVariant=Owner%3Aeng&includeVariant=Owner%3Aservice-delivery&includeVariant=Platform%3Aaws&includeVariant=Platform%3Aazure&includeVariant=Platform%3Agcp&includeVariant=Platform%3Ametal&includeVariant=Platform%3Arosa&includeVariant=Platform%3Avsphere&includeVariant=Topology%3Aexternal&includeVariant=Topology%3Aha&includeVariant=Topology%3Amicroshift&minFail=3&passRateAllTests=0&passRateNewTests=95&pity=5&sampleEndTime=2025-08-21%2023%3A59%3A59&sampleRelease=4.20&sampleStartTime=2025-08-14%2000%3A00%3A00