Skip to content

openshift/os: Split building and testing#16649

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:openshift-os-ci-take2
Mar 10, 2021
Merged

openshift/os: Split building and testing#16649
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:openshift-os-ci-take2

Conversation

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requires: openshift/os#513

Aiming to fix openshift/os#506

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 10, 2021
@cgwalters cgwalters marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2021 13:56
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 10, 2021
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the openshift-os-ci-take2 branch 3 times, most recently from 1e08e0b to a5693ea Compare March 10, 2021 14:35
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks sane to me!
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2021
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the openshift-os-ci-take2 branch from a5693ea to 24bfdf1 Compare March 10, 2021 14:47
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2021
@jlebon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jlebon commented Mar 10, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, jlebon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

$ oc project ci-op-w99k47vi
Now using project "ci-op-w99k47vi" on server "https://api.build02.gcp.ci.openshift.org:6443".
$ oc logs --since=5m -c test pod/build-test-qemu
=== RUN   basic/ServicesActive
=== RUN   basic/Useradd
=== RUN   basic/RHCOSGrowpart
=== RUN   basic/PortSSH
=== RUN   basic/DbusPerms
=== RUN   basic/NetworkScripts
=== RUN   basic/ReadOnly
=== RUN   basic/MachineID
--- PASS: basic (92.67s)
    --- PASS: basic/ServicesActive (0.14s)
    --- PASS: basic/Useradd (0.48s)
    --- PASS: basic/RHCOSGrowpart (0.15s)
    --- PASS: basic/PortSSH (0.12s)
    --- PASS: basic/DbusPerms (0.37s)
    --- PASS: basic/NetworkScripts (0.13s)
    --- PASS: basic/ReadOnly (0.12s)
    --- PASS: basic/MachineID (0.13s)
PASS, output in tmp/kola
+ cosa kola run 'ext.*'
⚠️  Skipping kola test pattern "crio.base":
⚠️  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917470 - x86_64
⚠️  Skipping kola test pattern "coreos.ignition.journald-log":
⚠️  https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/1173
kola --denylist-test crio.base --denylist-test coreos.ignition.journald-log -p qemu-unpriv --output-dir tmp/kola run ext.*
2021-03-10T15:18:12Z kola: Found non-executable file with shebang: test.sh
=== RUN   ext.config.networking.no-default-initramfs-net-propagation
=== RUN   ext.config.luks.tpm
=== RUN   ext.config.luks.ignition
=== RUN   ext.config.misc-ro.misc-ro.sh
=== RUN   ext.config.chrony.dhcp-propagation
=== RUN   ext.config.var-mount
--- PASS: ext.config.networking.no-default-initramfs-net-propagation (63.83s)
--- PASS: ext.config.chrony.dhcp-propagation (175.09s)

It's working!

🙏

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 15fd8f5 into openshift:master Mar 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cgwalters: Updated the following 3 configmaps:

  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/os/openshift-os-master.yaml
  • job-config-master configmap in namespace ci at cluster api.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/os/openshift-os-master-presubmits.yaml
  • job-config-master configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-os-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/os/openshift-os-master-presubmits.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Requires: openshift/os#513

Aiming to fix openshift/os#506

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI is broken tracker

4 participants