Skip to content

6.6 velinux intel idle support gnrd cwf#4

Closed
jiayingbao wants to merge 2 commits into
6.6-velinuxfrom
6.6-velinux-intel-idle-support-gnrd-cwf
Closed

6.6 velinux intel idle support gnrd cwf#4
jiayingbao wants to merge 2 commits into
6.6-velinuxfrom
6.6-velinux-intel-idle-support-gnrd-cwf

Conversation

@jiayingbao
Copy link
Copy Markdown

backport intel_idle support for GNRD and CWF
commit eeed4bfbe9b9 intel_idle: add Clearwater Forest SoC support.
commit f557e0d1c2e6 intel_idle: add Granite Rapids Xeon D support.

dedekind added 2 commits June 10, 2025 16:06
commit f557e0d1c2e6eb6af6d4468ed2c0ee91829370e2 upstream.

Add Granite Rapids Xeon D C-states support: C1, C1E, C6, and C6P.

The C-states are basically the same as in Granite Rapids Xeon SP/AP, but
characteristics (latency, target residency) are a bit different.

Intel-SIG: commit f557e0d1c2e6 intel_idle: add Granite Rapids Xeon D support.
Backport Intel idle GNR-D support.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241107115608.52233-1-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[ Yingbao Jia: amend commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Yingbao Jia <yingbao.jia@intel.com>
commit eeed4bfbe9b96214162a09a7fbb7570fa9522ca4 upstream.

Clearwater Forest (CWF) SoC has the same C-states as Sierra Forest (SRF)
SoC.  Add CWF support by re-using the SRF C-states table.

Note: it is expected that CWF C-states will have same or very similar
characteristics as SRF C-states (latency and target residency).

However, there is a possibility that the characteristics will end up
being different enough when the CWF platform development is finished.
In that case, a separate CWF C-states table will be created and populated
with the CWF-specific characteristics (latency and target residency).

Intel-SIG: commit eeed4bfbe9b9 intel_idle: add Clearwater Forest SoC support.
Backport Intel idle CWF support.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241203130306.1559024-1-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[ Yingbao Jia: amend commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Yingbao Jia <yingbao.jia@intel.com>
@jiayingbao jiayingbao closed this Jun 10, 2025
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
commit b313a8c upstream.

Lockdep reported a warning in Linux version 6.6:

[  414.344659] ================================
[  414.345155] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  414.345658] 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda #6 Not tainted
[  414.346221] --------------------------------
[  414.346712] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  414.347545] kworker/u10:3/1152 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
[  414.349245] ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0
[  414.351204] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  414.351751]   lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460
[  414.352218]   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x60
[  414.352769]   __wake_up_common_lock+0x22/0x60
[  414.353289]   sbitmap_queue_wake_up+0x375/0x4f0
[  414.353829]   sbitmap_queue_clear+0xdd/0x270
[  414.354338]   blk_mq_put_tag+0xdf/0x170
[  414.354807]   __blk_mq_free_request+0x381/0x4d0
[  414.355335]   blk_mq_free_request+0x28b/0x3e0
[  414.355847]   __blk_mq_end_request+0x242/0xc30
[  414.356367]   scsi_end_request+0x2c1/0x830
[  414.345155] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  414.345658] 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda #6 Not tainted
[  414.346221] --------------------------------
[  414.346712] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  414.347545] kworker/u10:3/1152 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
[  414.349245] ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0
[  414.351204] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  414.351751]   lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460
[  414.352218]   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x60
[  414.352769]   __wake_up_common_lock+0x22/0x60
[  414.353289]   sbitmap_queue_wake_up+0x375/0x4f0
[  414.353829]   sbitmap_queue_clear+0xdd/0x270
[  414.354338]   blk_mq_put_tag+0xdf/0x170
[  414.354807]   __blk_mq_free_request+0x381/0x4d0
[  414.355335]   blk_mq_free_request+0x28b/0x3e0
[  414.355847]   __blk_mq_end_request+0x242/0xc30
[  414.356367]   scsi_end_request+0x2c1/0x830
[  414.356863]   scsi_io_completion+0x177/0x1610
[  414.357379]   scsi_complete+0x12f/0x260
[  414.357856]   blk_complete_reqs+0xba/0xf0
[  414.358338]   __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x7a2
[  414.358796]   irq_exit_rcu+0x14b/0x1a0
[  414.359262]   sysvec_call_function_single+0xaf/0xc0
[  414.359828]   asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20
[  414.360426]   default_idle+0x1e/0x30
[  414.360873]   default_idle_call+0x9b/0x1f0
[  414.361390]   do_idle+0x2d2/0x3e0
[  414.361819]   cpu_startup_entry+0x55/0x60
[  414.362314]   start_secondary+0x235/0x2b0
[  414.362809]   secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x18f/0x19b
[  414.363413] irq event stamp: 428794
[  414.363825] hardirqs last  enabled at (428793): [<ffffffff816bfd1c>] ktime_get+0x1dc/0x200
[  414.364694] hardirqs last disabled at (428794): [<ffffffff85470177>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x47/0x50
[  414.365629] softirqs last  enabled at (428444): [<ffffffff85474780>] __do_softirq+0x540/0x7a2
[  414.366522] softirqs last disabled at (428419): [<ffffffff813f65ab>] irq_exit_rcu+0x14b/0x1a0
[  414.367425]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[  414.368194]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  414.368900]        CPU0
[  414.369225]        ----
[  414.369548]   lock(&sbq->ws[i].wait);
[  414.370000]   <Interrupt>
[  414.370342]     lock(&sbq->ws[i].wait);
[  414.370802]
                *** DEADLOCK ***
[  414.371569] 5 locks held by kworker/u10:3/1152:
[  414.372088]  #0: ffff88810130e938 ((wq_completion)writeback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x357/0x13f0
[  414.373180]  #1: ffff88810201fdb8 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x3a3/0x13f0
[  414.374384]  #2: ffffffff86ffbdc0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x637/0xa00
[  414.375342]  #3: ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0
[  414.376377]  #4: ffff888106205a08 (&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1337/0x1ee0
[  414.378607]
               stack backtrace:
[  414.379177] CPU: 0 PID: 1152 Comm: kworker/u10:3 Not tainted 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda #6
[  414.380032] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  414.381177] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)
[  414.381805] Call Trace:
[  414.382136]  <TASK>
[  414.382429]  dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0
[  414.382884]  mark_lock_irq+0xb3b/0x1260
[  414.383367]  ? __pfx_mark_lock_irq+0x10/0x10
[  414.383889]  ? stack_trace_save+0x8e/0xc0
[  414.384373]  ? __pfx_stack_trace_save+0x10/0x10
[  414.384903]  ? graph_lock+0xcf/0x410
[  414.385350]  ? save_trace+0x3d/0xc70
[  414.385808]  mark_lock.part.20+0x56d/0xa90
[  414.386317]  mark_held_locks+0xb0/0x110
[  414.386791]  ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
[  414.387320]  lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0
[  414.387901]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50
[  414.388422]  trace_hardirqs_on+0x58/0x100
[  414.388917]  _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50
[  414.389422]  __blk_mq_tag_busy+0x1d6/0x2a0
[  414.389920]  __blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x761/0x9f0
[  414.390899]  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1780/0x1ee0
[  414.391473]  ? __pfx_blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10/0x10
[  414.392070]  ? sbitmap_get+0x2b8/0x450
[  414.392533]  ? __blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x210/0x9f0
[  414.393095]  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xd99/0x1690
[  414.393730]  ? elv_attempt_insert_merge+0x1b1/0x420
[  414.394302]  ? __pfx___blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x10/0x10
[  414.394970]  ? lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460
[  414.395456]  ? blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x637/0xa00
[  414.395986]  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
[  414.396499]  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x109/0x190
[  414.397100]  blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x66e/0xa00
[  414.397616]  blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.17+0x614/0x2030
[  414.398244]  ? __pfx_blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.17+0x10/0x10
[  414.398897]  ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x241/0xcc0
[  414.399429]  blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x65/0x80
[  414.399957]  __blk_flush_plug+0x2f1/0x530
[  414.400458]  ? __pfx___blk_flush_plug+0x10/0x10
[  414.400999]  blk_finish_plug+0x59/0xa0
[  414.401467]  wb_writeback+0x7cc/0x920
[  414.401935]  ? __pfx_wb_writeback+0x10/0x10
[  414.402442]  ? mark_held_locks+0xb0/0x110
[  414.402931]  ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
[  414.403462]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0
[  414.404062]  wb_workfn+0x2b3/0xcf0
[  414.404500]  ? __pfx_wb_workfn+0x10/0x10
[  414.404989]  process_scheduled_works+0x432/0x13f0
[  414.405546]  ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10
[  414.406139]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x101/0x2a0
[  414.406641]  ? assign_work+0x19b/0x240
[  414.407106]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x9d/0x110
[  414.407604]  worker_thread+0x6f2/0x1160
[  414.408075]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x62/0x210
[  414.408572]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0
[  414.409168]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x13c/0x210
[  414.409678]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[  414.410191]  kthread+0x33c/0x440
[  414.410602]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  414.411068]  ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80
[  414.411526]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  414.411993]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[  414.412489]  </TASK>

When interrupt is turned on while a lock holding by spin_lock_irq it
throws a warning because of potential deadlock.

blk_mq_prep_dispatch_rq
 blk_mq_get_driver_tag
  __blk_mq_get_driver_tag
   __blk_mq_alloc_driver_tag
    blk_mq_tag_busy -> tag is already busy
    // failed to get driver tag
 blk_mq_mark_tag_wait
  spin_lock_irq(&wq->lock) -> lock A (&sbq->ws[i].wait)
  __add_wait_queue(wq, wait) -> wait queue active
  blk_mq_get_driver_tag
  __blk_mq_tag_busy
-> 1) tag must be idle, which means there can't be inflight IO
   spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock) -> lock B (hctx->tags)
   spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock) -> unlock B, turn on interrupt accidentally
-> 2) context must be preempt by IO interrupt to trigger deadlock.

As shown above, the deadlock is not possible in theory, but the warning
still need to be fixed.

Fix it by using spin_lock_irqsave to get lockB instead of spin_lock_irq.

Fixes: 4f1731d ("blk-mq: fix potential io hang by wrong 'wake_batch'")
Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815024736.2040971-1-lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2025
commit 05703271c3cdcc0f2a8cf6ebdc45892b8ca83520 upstream.

Before disabling SR-IOV via config space accesses to the parent PF,
sriov_disable() first removes the PCI devices representing the VFs.

Since commit 9d16947 ("PCI: Add global pci_lock_rescan_remove()")
such removal operations are serialized against concurrent remove and
rescan using the pci_rescan_remove_lock. No such locking was ever added
in sriov_disable() however. In particular when commit 18f9e9d
("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()") factored out the PCI device
removal into sriov_del_vfs() there was still no locking around the
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() calls.

On s390 the lack of serialization in sriov_disable() may cause double
remove and list corruption with the below (amended) trace being observed:

  PSW:  0704c00180000000 0000000c914e4b38 (klist_put+56)
  GPRS: 000003800313fb48 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 0000000000000001
	00000000f9b520a8 0000000000000000 0000000000002fbd 00000000f4cc9480
	0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000180692828
	00000000818e8000 000003800313fe2c 000003800313fb20 000003800313fad8
  #0 [3800313fb20] device_del at c9158ad5c
  #1 [3800313fb88] pci_remove_bus_device at c915105ba
  #2 [3800313fbd0] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at c9152f198
  #3 [3800313fc28] zpci_iov_remove_virtfn at c90fb67c0
  #4 [3800313fc60] zpci_bus_remove_device at c90fb6104
  #5 [3800313fca0] __zpci_event_availability at c90fb3dca
  #6 [3800313fd08] chsc_process_sei_nt0 at c918fe4a2
  #7 [3800313fd60] crw_collect_info at c91905822
  #8 [3800313fe10] kthread at c90feb390
  #9 [3800313fe68] __ret_from_fork at c90f6aa64
  openvelinux#10 [3800313fe98] ret_from_fork at c9194f3f2.

This is because in addition to sriov_disable() removing the VFs, the
platform also generates hot-unplug events for the VFs. This being the
reverse operation to the hotplug events generated by sriov_enable() and
handled via pdev->no_vf_scan. And while the event processing takes
pci_rescan_remove_lock and checks whether the struct pci_dev still exists,
the lack of synchronization makes this checking racy.

Other races may also be possible of course though given that this lack of
locking persisted so long observable races seem very rare. Even on s390 the
list corruption was only observed with certain devices since the platform
events are only triggered by config accesses after the removal, so as long
as the removal finished synchronously they would not race. Either way the
locking is missing so fix this by adding it to the sriov_del_vfs() helper.

Just like PCI rescan-remove, locking is also missing in sriov_add_vfs()
including for the error case where pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() is
called without the PCI rescan-remove lock being held. Even in the non-error
case, adding new PCI devices and buses should be serialized via the PCI
rescan-remove lock. Add the necessary locking.

Fixes: 18f9e9d ("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250826-pci_fix_sriov_disable-v1-1-2d0bc938f2a3@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
[ Upstream commit d9cef55ed49117bd63695446fb84b4b91815c0b4 ]

BPF CI testing report a UAF issue:

  [   16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003  0
  [   16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod  e
  [   16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag  e
  [   16.447878] PGD 0 P4D   0
  [   16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT  I
  [   16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G           OE      6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4  2
  [   16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL  E
  [   16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201  4
  [   16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor  k
  [   16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024  6
  [   16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030  0
  [   16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000  0
  [   16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000  5
  [   16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640  0
  [   16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092  0
  [   16.454996] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000  0
  [   16.455557] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003  3
  [   16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef  0
  [   16.456459] PKRU: 5555555  4
  [   16.456654] Call Trace  :
  [   16.456832]  <TASK  >
  [   16.456989]  ? __die+0x23/0x7  0
  [   16.457215]  ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c  0
  [   16.457508]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249  0
  [   16.457801]  ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20  0
  [   16.458080]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3  0
  [   16.458389]  ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.458689]  ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.458987]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10  0
  [   16.459284]  process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d  0
  [   16.459570]  worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38  0
  [   16.459839]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.460144]  kthread+0xe0/0x11  0
  [   16.460372]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.460640]  ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5  0
  [   16.460896]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.461166]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3  0
  [   16.461453]  </TASK  >
  [   16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE)  ]
  [   16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003  0
  [   16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  [   16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590

The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(),
newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore,
if the application closes the socket immediately after accept,
newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as
follows:

smc_listen_work                                 | userspace
-----------------------------------------------------------------
lock_sock(sk)                                   |
smc_listen_out_connected()                      |
| \- smc_listen_out                             |
|    | \- release_sock                          |
     | |- sk->sk_data_ready()                   |
                                                | fd = accept();
                                                | close(fd);
                                                |  \- socket->sk = NULL;
/* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */
SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk))

Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order
of the code can easily fix this issue.

Fixes: 3b2dec2 ("net/smc: restructure client and server code in af_smc")
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250818054618.41615-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
commit 05703271c3cdcc0f2a8cf6ebdc45892b8ca83520 upstream.

Before disabling SR-IOV via config space accesses to the parent PF,
sriov_disable() first removes the PCI devices representing the VFs.

Since commit 9d16947 ("PCI: Add global pci_lock_rescan_remove()")
such removal operations are serialized against concurrent remove and
rescan using the pci_rescan_remove_lock. No such locking was ever added
in sriov_disable() however. In particular when commit 18f9e9d
("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()") factored out the PCI device
removal into sriov_del_vfs() there was still no locking around the
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() calls.

On s390 the lack of serialization in sriov_disable() may cause double
remove and list corruption with the below (amended) trace being observed:

  PSW:  0704c00180000000 0000000c914e4b38 (klist_put+56)
  GPRS: 000003800313fb48 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 0000000000000001
	00000000f9b520a8 0000000000000000 0000000000002fbd 00000000f4cc9480
	0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000180692828
	00000000818e8000 000003800313fe2c 000003800313fb20 000003800313fad8
  #0 [3800313fb20] device_del at c9158ad5c
  #1 [3800313fb88] pci_remove_bus_device at c915105ba
  #2 [3800313fbd0] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at c9152f198
  #3 [3800313fc28] zpci_iov_remove_virtfn at c90fb67c0
  #4 [3800313fc60] zpci_bus_remove_device at c90fb6104
  #5 [3800313fca0] __zpci_event_availability at c90fb3dca
  #6 [3800313fd08] chsc_process_sei_nt0 at c918fe4a2
  #7 [3800313fd60] crw_collect_info at c91905822
  #8 [3800313fe10] kthread at c90feb390
  #9 [3800313fe68] __ret_from_fork at c90f6aa64
  openvelinux#10 [3800313fe98] ret_from_fork at c9194f3f2.

This is because in addition to sriov_disable() removing the VFs, the
platform also generates hot-unplug events for the VFs. This being the
reverse operation to the hotplug events generated by sriov_enable() and
handled via pdev->no_vf_scan. And while the event processing takes
pci_rescan_remove_lock and checks whether the struct pci_dev still exists,
the lack of synchronization makes this checking racy.

Other races may also be possible of course though given that this lack of
locking persisted so long observable races seem very rare. Even on s390 the
list corruption was only observed with certain devices since the platform
events are only triggered by config accesses after the removal, so as long
as the removal finished synchronously they would not race. Either way the
locking is missing so fix this by adding it to the sriov_del_vfs() helper.

Just like PCI rescan-remove, locking is also missing in sriov_add_vfs()
including for the error case where pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() is
called without the PCI rescan-remove lock being held. Even in the non-error
case, adding new PCI devices and buses should be serialized via the PCI
rescan-remove lock. Add the necessary locking.

Fixes: 18f9e9d ("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250826-pci_fix_sriov_disable-v1-1-2d0bc938f2a3@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
[ Upstream commit 59a931c ]

If the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with
page_pool_create().
The reference count of page pool is 1 as default.
A page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0.
page_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a
reference count.
When a page pool is destroyed, ->disconnect() is called, which is
mem_allocator_disconnect().
This function internally acquires mutex_lock().

If the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with
xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model().
The xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool
reference count if a memory model is a page pool.
Now the reference count is 2.

To destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy()
and xdp_unreg_mem_model().
The xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy().
Only page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count.

If a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we
will face an invalid wait context warning.
Because xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with
rcu_read_lock().
The page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock().

Splat looks like:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W
-----------------------------
ethtool/1806 is trying to lock:
ffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
3 locks held by ethtool/1806:
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed
Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
__lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0
? _printk+0x64/0xe0
? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10
? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
lock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580
? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0
? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0
__mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690
? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10
? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10
? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140
? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90
? __irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330
? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50
? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0
? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150
? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10
? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
page_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0
page_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440
xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0
? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10
? kfree+0x125/0x370
? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500
? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500
xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0
bnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500
bnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0
? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10
? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0
? __pfx___nla_validate_parse+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10
bnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0
__netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370
? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750
? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10
? __pfx___netdev_update_features+0x10/0x10
? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70
? __pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110
ethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20

To fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of
rhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock().
Using xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe.
xa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by
call_rcu() of mem_xa_remove().
The mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference
count reaches 0.
The xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the
control plane.
So removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe.

Fixes: c3f812c ("page_pool: do not release pool until inflight == 0.")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240712095116.3801586-1-ap420073@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tengteng Yang <yangtengteng@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
[ Upstream commit 65e8fbd ]

There is this reported crash when experimenting with the lvm2 testsuite.
The list corruption is caused by the fact that the postsuspend and resume
methods were not paired correctly; there were two consecutive calls to the
origin_postsuspend function. The second call attempts to remove the
"hash_list" entry from a list, while it was already removed by the first
call.

Fix __dm_internal_resume so that it calls the preresume and resume
methods of the table's targets.

If a preresume method of some target fails, we are in a tricky situation.
We can't return an error because dm_internal_resume isn't supposed to
return errors. We can't return success, because then the "resume" and
"postsuspend" methods would not be paired correctly. So, we set the
DMF_SUSPENDED flag and we fake normal suspend - it may confuse userspace
tools, but it won't cause a kernel crash.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:56!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 8343 Comm: dmsetup Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6 #4
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x77/0xc0
<snip>
RSP: 0018:ffff8881b831bcc0 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffff888143b6eb80 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff819053d0 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff8881b83a3400 R08: 00000000fffeffff R09: 0000000000000058
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff81a24080 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffff88814538e000 R14: ffff888143bc6dc0 R15: ffffffffa02e4bb0
FS:  00000000f7c0f780(0000) GS:ffff8893f0a40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000057fb5000 CR3: 0000000143474000 CR4: 00000000000006b0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? die+0x2d/0x80
 ? do_trap+0xeb/0xf0
 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x77/0xc0
 ? do_error_trap+0x60/0x80
 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x77/0xc0
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x49/0x60
 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x77/0xc0
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? table_deps+0x1b0/0x1b0 [dm_mod]
 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x77/0xc0
 origin_postsuspend+0x1a/0x50 [dm_snapshot]
 dm_table_postsuspend_targets+0x34/0x50 [dm_mod]
 dm_suspend+0xd8/0xf0 [dm_mod]
 dev_suspend+0x1f2/0x2f0 [dm_mod]
 ? table_deps+0x1b0/0x1b0 [dm_mod]
 ctl_ioctl+0x300/0x5f0 [dm_mod]
 dm_compat_ctl_ioctl+0x7/0x10 [dm_mod]
 __x64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x104/0x170
 do_syscall_64+0x184/0x1b0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
RIP: 0033:0xf7e6aead
<snip>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: ffcc393 ("dm: enhance internal suspend and resume interface")
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Bijlani <ashish.bijlani@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
…le_direct_reclaim()

commit 6aaced5abd32e2a57cd94fd64f824514d0361da8 upstream.

The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because
allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false.

 #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac
 #1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c
 #2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c
 #3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550
 #4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68
 #5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660
 #6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98
 #7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8
 #8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974
 #9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4

At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones:

        NODE: 4  ZONE: 0  ADDR: ffff00817fffe540  NAME: "DMA32"
          SIZE: 20480  MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45
          VM_STAT:
                NR_FREE_PAGES: 359
        NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813
          NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0
        NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50
          NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0
          NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0
        NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0
                     NR_MLOCK: 0
                    NR_BOUNCE: 0
                   NR_ZSPAGES: 0
            NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0

        NODE: 4  ZONE: 1  ADDR: ffff00817fffec00  NAME: "Normal"
          SIZE: 8454144  PRESENT: 98304  MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264
          VM_STAT:
                NR_FREE_PAGES: 146
        NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668
          NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3
        NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735
          NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78
          NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0
        NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0
                     NR_MLOCK: 0
                    NR_BOUNCE: 0
                   NR_ZSPAGES: 0
            NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0

In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of
inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages()
based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero.

Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/
active anonymous pages is skipped.

        crash> p nr_swap_pages
        nr_swap_pages = $1937 = {
          counter = 0
        }

As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to
the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having
free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark.

The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented.

        crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures
        $1935 = 0x0

This is because the node deemed balanced.  The node balancing logic in
balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively.  If one or more zones
(e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the
entire node is deemed balanced.  This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early
before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall
memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain
under significant pressure.

The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages
(NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are
available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages).  This change prevents
zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being
mistakenly deemed unreclaimable.  By doing so, the patch ensures proper
node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL,
and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by
allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false.

The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused
by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain
zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL.  This issue arises from
zone_reclaimable_pages() returning 0 for zones without reclaimable file-
backed or anonymous pages, causing zones like ZONE_DMA32 with sufficient
free pages to be skipped.

The lack of swap or reclaimable pages results in ZONE_DMA32 being ignored
during reclaim, masking pressure in other zones.  Consequently,
pgdat->kswapd_failures remains 0 in balance_pgdat(), preventing fallback
mechanisms in allow_direct_reclaim() from being triggered, leading to an
infinite loop in throttle_direct_reclaim().

This patch modifies zone_reclaimable_pages() to account for free pages
(NR_FREE_PAGES) when no other reclaimable pages exist.  This ensures zones
with sufficient free pages are not skipped, enabling proper balancing and
reclaim behavior.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241130164346.436469-1-snishika@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241130161236.433747-2-snishika@redhat.com
Fixes: 5a1c84b ("mm: remove reclaim and compaction retry approximations")
Signed-off-by: Seiji Nishikawa <snishika@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Bijlani <ashish.bijlani@bytedance.com>
x56Jason pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
[ Upstream commit f1e197a ]

trace_drop_common() is called with preemption disabled, and it acquires
a spin_lock. This is problematic for RT kernels because spin_locks are
sleeping locks in this configuration, which causes the following splat:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 449, name: rcuc/47
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2
5 locks held by rcuc/47/449:
 #0: ff1100086ec30a60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x105/0x210
 #1: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0xbf/0x130
 #2: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x11c/0x210
 #3: ffffffffb394a160 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch+0x360/0xc70
 #4: ff1100086ee07520 (&data->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290
irq event stamp: 139909
hardirqs last  enabled at (139908): [<ffffffffb1df2b33>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x63/0x80
hardirqs last disabled at (139909): [<ffffffffb19bd03d>] trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x26d/0x290
softirqs last  enabled at (139892): [<ffffffffb07a1083>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x103/0x170
softirqs last disabled at (139898): [<ffffffffb0909b33>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0x93/0x1f0
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffffffb1de786b>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0xab/0x2e0
CPU: 47 PID: 449 Comm: rcuc/47 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-rt1+ #7
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R650/0Y2G81, BIOS 1.6.5 04/15/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0
 dump_stack+0x14/0x20
 __might_resched+0x21e/0x2f0
 rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x130
 ? trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290
 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230
 trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290
 ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x80
 ? __pfx_trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
 ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x26a/0x2e0
 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230
 ? __pfx_rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x10/0x10
 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230
 trace_kfree_skb_hit+0x15/0x20
 trace_kfree_skb+0xe9/0x150
 kfree_skb_reason+0x7b/0x110
 skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230
 ? __pfx_skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x10/0x10
 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x8a/0x520
...

trace_drop_common() also disables interrupts, but this is a minor issue
because we could easily replace it with a local_lock.

Replace the spin_lock with raw_spin_lock to avoid sleeping in atomic
context.

Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Hu Chunyu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Bijlani <ashish.bijlani@bytedance.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants