Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update test configurations by modifying mock data—such as token addresses, chain identifiers, and blockchain fields—in several components. Additionally, the updates integrate a private key login mechanism throughout the application. A new custom hook ( Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant M as Main Component
participant PKP as PrivateKeyLoginProvider
participant Hook as usePrivateKeyLogin
participant BM as BottomMenu
U->>M: Access application (with pk URL param)
M->>Hook: Extract account from URL parameters
Hook->>PKP: Retrieve/update account state
PKP-->>M: Return current account info
M->>BM: Render BottomMenu if authenticated (account exists)
BM-->>U: Display authenticated UI
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/containers/Main.tsx (2)
70-72: Storing tokens in local storage can pose security risks.
Consider using httponly cookies or another secure storage mechanism to minimize exposure to XSS attacks.
89-114: Ensure no long-lived private key storage in memory.
The code only saves the address to localStorage, which is good. Just verify the private key is promptly discarded.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
src/apps/deposit/components/Asset/test/__snapshots__/Asset.test.tsx.snapis excluded by!**/*.snapsrc/apps/pillarx-app/components/MediaGridCollection/tests/__snapshots__/DisplayCollectionImage.test.tsx.snapis excluded by!**/*.snapsrc/apps/pillarx-app/components/PointsTile/test/__snapshots__/PointsTile.test.tsx.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
src/apps/deposit/components/Asset/test/Asset.test.tsx(2 hunks)src/apps/deposit/components/AssetsList/test/AssetsList.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/apps/pillarx-app/components/TokensHorizontalTile/test/TokensHorizontalTile.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/BottomMenu/BottomMenu.test.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/BottomMenu/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/BottomMenuModal/AccountModal.tsx(3 hunks)src/containers/Main.tsx(5 hunks)src/hooks/usePrivateKeyLogin.tsx(1 hunks)src/providers/PrivateKeyLoginProvider.tsx(1 hunks)src/providers/__tests__/GlobalTransactionsBatchProvider.test.tsx(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: lint
- GitHub Check: unit-tests
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (20)
src/apps/deposit/components/AssetsList/test/AssetsList.test.tsx (1)
8-9:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the mock data consistency with Polygon network.
The mock data has been updated to use Polygon network values (chain ID 137). This aligns with the changes in other test files and appears to be part of a broader shift to Polygon network testing.
Let's verify that this address exists on the Polygon network:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the token address on Polygon network curl -s "https://api.polygonscan.com/api?module=token&action=tokeninfo&contractaddress=0xD6DF932A45C0f255f85145f286eA0b292B21C90B"Length of output: 200
Attention: Verify API key for token verification on Polygon network.
The mock data in
AssetsList.test.tsxhas been updated to use values for the Polygon network (chain ID 137), which is consistent with changes in the rest of the test files. However, our automated token verification via Polygonscan returned a "Missing/Invalid API Key" error. This means we couldn’t conclusively verify that the address0xD6DF932A45C0f255f85145f286eA0b292B21C90Bis valid on the Polygon network.
- Ensure a valid API key is provided for Polygonscan if automated verification is required.
- Alternatively, perform manual verification of the token data to confirm its validity for Polygon testing.
src/apps/deposit/components/Asset/test/Asset.test.tsx (1)
11-12: LGTM! Test data and expectations are properly aligned.The mock token data and test expectations have been consistently updated to reflect the shift from Ethereum to Polygon network.
Also applies to: 53-53
src/providers/__tests__/GlobalTransactionsBatchProvider.test.tsx (1)
13-15: LGTM! Mock transaction data is consistent.The mock transaction data has been updated to use the same Polygon network address and chain ID as other files, maintaining consistency across the test suite.
src/containers/Main.tsx (11)
10-16: LGTM for new viem imports.
All imported symbols appear to be used properly, and there's no sign of extraneous imports.
26-26: Provider import looks good.
This addition is consistent with the new private key login approach.
45-45: Importing the custom hook is correct.
The integration withusePrivateKeyLoginaligns well with the rest of the file.
65-65: Consider clearing state on logout.
While retrievingaccountfrom the custom hook is fine, ensure there's a robust logout path that resetssetAccountand local storage to prevent stale data.
74-74: Predicate for combined auth state is clear.
No issues; combiningauthenticatedwith the presence ofaccountis well-structured.
78-83: Documentation comments match the new feature.
The docstring accurately describes the updated useEffect logic for private key and wallet states.
117-139: Verify default chain selection logic.
The code defaults to chain ID 1 (mainnet). Please confirm that this aligns with user expectations, especially if testnets are required.
140-178: Multi-wallet handling appears correct.
Steps to find and configure the specified wallet provider look coherent and handle fallback to the first visible chain reliably.
187-187: Gating logic is sound.
RequiringisAppReady,isAuthenticated,provider, andchainIdhelps prevent rendering incomplete states.
273-273: No issues with unauthorized route checks.
This condition ensures proper routing for unauthenticated scenarios.
327-342: Nested providers are well-ordered.
WrappingPrivyProviderinsidePrivateKeyLoginProvideris coherent for the intended logic flow.src/hooks/usePrivateKeyLogin.tsx (1)
1-17: Custom hook implementation looks good.
It validates context usage properly and ensures consumers cannot access it outside of the provider.src/providers/PrivateKeyLoginProvider.tsx (1)
1-37: Context provider is well-structured.
Storing only the address and not the private key reduces risk, and usinguseMemoavoids unnecessary re-renders.src/components/BottomMenu/BottomMenu.test.tsx (1)
67-73: LGTM! Test setup correctly includes PrivateKeyLoginProvider.The test configuration properly wraps the component with
PrivateKeyLoginProviderin both authenticated and unauthenticated scenarios, ensuring the test environment matches the production setup.Also applies to: 112-118
src/components/BottomMenu/index.tsx (1)
32-32: LGTM! Authentication check properly handles both login methods.The component now correctly checks for both
authenticatedstate from Privy andaccountfrom private key login, ensuring proper access control regardless of the authentication method used.Also applies to: 61-61
src/components/BottomMenuModal/AccountModal.tsx (2)
136-151: Verify the necessity of window reload after logout.While the logout logic correctly handles both authentication methods, the forced window reload might disrupt the user experience. Consider if this is necessary or if a more seamless transition could be implemented.
Could you clarify if the window reload is required for proper cleanup of the application state? If not, consider replacing it with a more graceful state reset mechanism.
58-58: LGTM! Logout logic properly handles both authentication methods.The implementation correctly:
- Distinguishes between private key and social login
- Cleans up appropriate storage
- Resets account state
Also applies to: 137-143
| address: '0xD6DF932A45C0f255f85145f286eA0b292B21C90B', | ||
| blockchain: '137', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Consider type consistency for blockchain identifier.
While the address update is consistent with other files, the blockchain identifier is stored as a string ('137') while other files use a number (137). This might cause type-related issues if the component expects a specific type.
Let's check how the blockchain field is used across the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check blockchain field usage
# Search for blockchain field in type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
blockchain: $_
$$$
}'
# Search for blockchain field usage
rg -A 2 'blockchain.*137'Length of output: 430
Action Required: Ensure Consistent Numeric Type for Blockchain Identifier
It appears that the test file (src/apps/pillarx-app/components/TokensHorizontalTile/test/TokensHorizontalTile.test.tsx, lines 22–23) defines the blockchain field as a string ('137') rather than a number. Since other parts of the codebase are using a numeric value (137) for this field, please update this test to maintain type consistency and avoid potential issues.
- File:
src/apps/pillarx-app/components/TokensHorizontalTile/test/TokensHorizontalTile.test.tsx - Location: Lines 22–23
- Suggestion: Change the blockchain property from a string to a numeric literal (i.e., update from
'137'to137).
| const searchURL = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search); | ||
| const searchURLPK = searchURL.get('pk'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid passing private key parameters via URL.
Query parameters are often logged and can expose the private key inadvertently. A safer channel should be considered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By design for an edge case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@IAmKio Understood, I'll note this design decision for future reviews.
(_/)
(•-•)
/> 📝
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: IAmKio
PR: pillarwallet/x#243
File: src/containers/Main.tsx:85-86
Timestamp: 2025-02-20T19:50:40.311Z
Learning: Passing private key via URL parameters in the login flow is an intentional design choice for handling edge cases in the private key login mode.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
Deploying x with
|
| Latest commit: |
ccd102f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://03bbdeb8.x-e62.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-pro-3018-private-key-mo.x-e62.pages.dev |
IAmKio
left a comment
IAmKio
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just two small questions but other than that - it's looking good!
| const searchURL = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search); | ||
| const searchURLPK = searchURL.get('pk'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By design for an edge case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/BottomMenuModal/AccountModal.tsx (1)
136-151: Consider documenting the timeout workaround.The dual logout flow is well-implemented, handling both private key and social login cases. The timeout is a known workaround for SDK timing issues.
Add a code comment explaining the timeout workaround:
clearDappStorage(); navigate('/'); - // Time to logout and redirect route + // Workaround: Added timeout to ensure proper page reload after logout + // due to timing issues with the Modular SDK not automatically + // reloading the page setTimeout(() => window.location.reload(), 500);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/BottomMenuModal/AccountModal.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: unit-tests
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/BottomMenuModal/AccountModal.tsx (2)
47-47: LGTM! Clean integration of private key login.The addition of the
usePrivateKeyLoginhook and its usage is well-structured and aligns with the PR's objective of implementing private key login functionality.Also applies to: 58-58
56-379: LGTM! Well-contained changes.The private key login integration is cleanly implemented without affecting the core token and NFT display functionality of the component.
2 participants
Description
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor