Skip to content

reference/configuration: update note for stmt-count-limit #1984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
sre-bot merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2020
Merged

reference/configuration: update note for stmt-count-limit #1984

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
96295b8
reference/configuration: update note for stmt-count-limit
TomShawn Mar 10, 2020
64ff9c8
Merge branch 'master' into stmt_limit
TomShawn Mar 10, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion reference/configuration/tidb-server/configuration-file.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ Configuration items related to performance.

- The maximum number of statements allowed in a single TiDB transaction.
- Default value: `5000`
- If a transaction does not roll back or commit after the number of statements exceeds `stmt-count-limit`, TiDB returns the `statement count 5001 exceeds the transaction limitation, autocommit = false` error.
- If a transaction does not roll back or commit after the number of statements exceeds `stmt-count-limit`, TiDB returns the `statement count 5001 exceeds the transaction limitation, autocommit = false` error. This configuration takes effect **only** in the retriable optimistic transaction. If you use the pessimistic transaction or have disabled the transaction retry, the number of statements in a transaction is not limited by this configuration.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jackysp jackysp Mar 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add the link of the transaction retry?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@TomShawn TomShawn Mar 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The transaction retry part is to be translated in #1695, so I remove the link here. When #1695 is merged, I'll add this link here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jackysp jackysp Mar 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

got


### `tcp-keep-alive`

Expand Down