Skip to content

Conversation

@IshaanDesai
Copy link
Member

@IshaanDesai IshaanDesai commented Apr 7, 2021

Release of python-bindings v2.2.0.2 which is compatible with preCICE v2.2.0

There are important new features:

Please refer to the CHANGELOG.md for details

BenjaminRodenberg and others added 18 commits January 19, 2021 22:22
Apply naming scheme repo-vX.X.X.X for release branch
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Rodenberg <benjamin.rodenberg@in.tum.de>
Allow for `pyprecice` that are newer than 2.0.
* Experiment with architecture proposed in https://github.com/haampie-spack/ci-example.
* Add workflow for building dependencies from https://github.com/haampie-spack/ci-example.
* Use spack dev-build, don't use jinja.
* Build env on a weekly basis via cron job.
* Do build for generic architecture x86_64. #81
* Adding error messages to check length of values and vertex id arrays provided for write commands

* Adding provided and expected values in assertion statements

Co-authored-by: ishaandesai <ishaandesai@gmail.com>
@IshaanDesai IshaanDesai self-assigned this Apr 7, 2021
@IshaanDesai IshaanDesai added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2021
Copy link
Member

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg self-requested a review April 7, 2021 14:55
Copy link
Member

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The previous review was, of course, an approval. Just pressed the wrong button. Sorry.

@IshaanDesai IshaanDesai merged commit 7eeadef into master Apr 7, 2021
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg deleted the python-bindings-v2.2.0.2 branch April 13, 2021 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants