Skip to content

Add classifier for MIT-CMU licence#189

Merged
miketheman merged 1 commit intopypa:mainfrom
hugovk:add-mit-cmu
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Add classifier for MIT-CMU licence#189
miketheman merged 1 commit intopypa:mainfrom
hugovk:add-mit-cmu

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hugovk hugovk commented Oct 11, 2024

Request to add a new Trove classifier.

The name of the classifier(s) you would like to add:

  • License :: OSI Approved :: MIT-CMU License

Why do you want to add this classifier?

We discovered this is the licence used by Pillow:

We have had it approved by OSI:


If at all possible, it would be wonderful if this was released in time for our quarterly release this Tuesday (2024-10-15), but I understand this is a very notice so may not be doable :)

@miketheman miketheman merged commit 3ceadd0 into pypa:main Oct 11, 2024
@hugovk hugovk deleted the add-mit-cmu branch October 11, 2024 13:21
@hugovk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hugovk commented Oct 11, 2024

Thank you for the quick merge and release! 🚀

https://github.com/pypa/trove-classifiers/releases/tag/2024.10.11

"License :: OSI Approved :: Jabber Open Source License",
"License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License",
"License :: OSI Approved :: MIT No Attribution License (MIT-0)",
"License :: OSI Approved :: MIT-CMU License",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably should have included the SPDX identifier in parentheses like the rest of our license classifiers. OSI also calls this the "CMU License" instead: https://opensource.org/license/cmu-license

Suggested change
"License :: OSI Approved :: MIT-CMU License",
"License :: OSI Approved :: CMU License (MIT-CMU)",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I've opened #190 as a follow-up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants