Port all conda recipes to rattler-build#772
Port all conda recipes to rattler-build#772rapids-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.08from
Conversation
|
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
|
/ok to test |
|
/ok to test |
@gforsyth, there was an error processing your request: See the following link for more information: https://docs.gha-runners.nvidia.com/cpr/e/1/ |
|
/ok to test |
jameslamb
left a comment
jameslamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great to me!
This https://github.com/rapidsai/integration/blob/branch-25.08/conda/recipes/versions.yaml is one bit that's a bit different here compared to other RAPIDS projects, so I double-checked build logs to be sure those versions were getting pulled through... all looks good to me.
I left one note about removing CUDA 11 stuff in this PR. Do what you want with it, I don't feel strongly about doing it now vs. later in a follow-up PR.
| - if: cuda_major == "11" | ||
| then: cudatoolkit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - if: cuda_major == "11" | |
| then: cudatoolkit |
Now that CUDA 11 support is getting dropped on 25.08 (rapidsai/build-planning#184), I think we could safely drop all the if: cuda_major == "11" stuff in any files you're already touching in this PR.
Notice that there aren't any CUDA 11 builds at https://github.com/rapidsai/integration/actions/runs/15421036533/job/43395979955?pr=772
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yep, that's a good shout!
|
|
||
| set -euo pipefail | ||
|
|
||
| rapids-configure-conda-channels |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎉 thank you! Getting closer on rapidsai/gha-tools#145 😁
|
/merge |
Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#197 Removes `cuspatial` and `cuproj` from the runtime dependencies of the `rapids` metapackage. The final releases of those packages were in RAPIDS 25.04. ## Notes for Reviewers ### Didn't we already do this? Yes, #757 removed this for 25.06 (and that was forward-merged to 25.08). But it looks like they were accidentally re-introduced in 25.08 via #772 And that technically worked because a small number of `cuspatial` and `cuproj` 25.08 nightlies did make it onto the `rapidsai-nightly` channel before we fully stopped development of `cuspatial`. Authors: - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb) Approvers: - Gil Forsyth (https://github.com/gforsyth) URL: #781
2 participants
xref rapidsai/build-planning#47
Supercedes #771 which is a history mess