Skip to content

Dr. Smith's review of Terminology section #185

@samm82

Description

@samm82

Other than #182, which I think should be done as part of #169 and the minor changes to this section reviewed then, the Terminology section is ready for review! As always, let me know if you have any questions!

Sam-Ch2-Terminology-v2.pdf

Sub-issues

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

reviewRequest for (or response to) review

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions