Conversation
I thought this was already done in another commit? Add date to ISTQB glossary ref
|
@samm82, why not use natbib ( |
|
Thanks for the clarification! I had seen this style in this PR used by one of the textbooks lent to me, so I second-guessed what you wanted, especially since it used a different package than Jason's template. In hindsight, neither reason is enough to warrant not using the specific package you had suggested, and I definitely see the usefulness of it.😅 Glad I double checked; will change this! |
|
Sounds good @samm82. If it helps, here is an example of a document written using natbib: |
|
So this still has to be done, right? As what's there is still not 'natbib' yet. |
While this doesn't exactly use
natbib, which is a different package thanbiblatex, this change seems to accomplish the desired result of having citations be referenced by an "ID" with the author name(s) and year. Is this what you were expecting?Closes # 7Replaced by #17