forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
[RFC]align mismatch ABI in info.h #1929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ enum sof_ipc_ext_data { | |
| SOF_IPC_EXT_UNUSED = 0, | ||
| SOF_IPC_EXT_WINDOW = 1, | ||
| SOF_IPC_EXT_CC_INFO = 2, | ||
| SOF_IPC_EXT_PROBE_INFO = 3, | ||
| SOF_IPC_EXT_USER_ABI_INFO = 4, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| /* FW version - SOF_IPC_GLB_VERSION */ | ||
|
|
@@ -114,4 +116,22 @@ struct sof_ipc_cc_version { | |
| char desc[]; /* null terminated compiler description */ | ||
| } __packed; | ||
|
|
||
| /* extended data: Probe setup */ | ||
| struct sof_ipc_probe_support { | ||
| struct sof_ipc_ext_data_hdr ext_hdr; | ||
|
|
||
| uint32_t probe_points_max; | ||
| uint32_t injection_dmas_max; | ||
|
|
||
| /* reserved for future use */ | ||
| uint32_t reserved[2]; | ||
| } __packed; | ||
|
|
||
| /* extended data: user abi version(s) */ | ||
| struct sof_ipc_user_abi_version { | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "user abi" is a bit weird name, but alas this was already merged to FW, so it's what it is. |
||
| struct sof_ipc_ext_data_hdr ext_hdr; | ||
|
|
||
| uint32_t abi_dbg_version; | ||
| } __packed; | ||
|
|
||
| #endif | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lgirdwood @jajanusz It really would be better to do the kernel PRs at the same time and have the person doing the change write a git commit message that explains the change. This "late-bound" sync of changes to kernel is not fun. Thanks for @xiulipan doing the patch, but I again have to ask for some improvements to the commit message:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree with @kv2019i , this is a complete fail of the ABI change process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The kernel and FW PRs must be done together and mention each other. It is up to maintainers to label as ABI and then to align both PRs using the classifier. So this is several steps taken by at least 3 people and is not being fully processed by everybody.
I am now wondering whether we should now be moving to a ABI minor bump only for every FW release (when the regular FW releases start soon). This would allow the kernel team to plan each merge window in advance to a specific FW version. @lbetlej fyi - regular FW releases would help here.
There is also complexity about bumping ABI in relation to kernel releases and FW releases. i.e. when do we close the ABI minor merge window for new kernel and FW releases (and use the next minor).