Continuous kludge to keep pdivt > 0#3579
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3579 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 31.21% 31.21%
=======================================
Files 83 83
Lines 19938 19938
=======================================
Hits 6223 6223
Misses 13715 13715 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
mkovari
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am bit concerned that you are redefining pdivt. If this code is ever run again then this change could be made repeatedly. Is there any chance of this happening?
I'm not quite sure what you mean; if you mean non-idempotence, then this isn't an issue: each time the model is called (with the same values) |
Ensure
pdivtis kept positive continuously.pdivtwith continuous kludge:And again, but with finer sampling resolution to show continuous nature: