Skip to content

moved content about trace-id into informative section as a first step…#351

Merged
SergeyKanzhelev merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
sergkanz/moveQuestionableContentInInformativeSection
Nov 5, 2019
Merged

moved content about trace-id into informative section as a first step…#351
SergeyKanzhelev merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
sergkanz/moveQuestionableContentInInformativeSection

Conversation

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev commented Nov 3, 2019

… of addressing larger feedback on operating 64bit systems

As a first step fixing #349 the entire note about the behavior of trace-id was moved to informative section. The reason for this move is to enable us writing recommendation freely even if they break formal requirement of propagating entire trace-id. This will enable us to explain better how 64bit systems should operate for better inter-oprability avoiding the demand to re-start the entire trace-id every time.


💥 Error: 500 Internal Server Error 💥

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Nov 3, 2019, 6:33 PM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec.

🔗 Related URL

�[33m📡 HTTP Error 520:�[39m �[36mhttps://rawcdn.githack.com/w3c/trace-context/a80774c4072eb86cf87a4a2df5a224f7ab3ca527/index.html�[39m

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

… of addressing larger feedback on operating 64bit systems
If the `trace-id` value is invalid (for example if it contains non-allowed characters or all zeros), vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent`.

See [considerations for trace-id field
generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation) for recommendations
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should the link point to spec/60-trace-id-format.md ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it results in a single document... This link definitely works, not sure if it will work when we specify the markdown file name. I will check and fix all links like this if ReSpec is smart enough

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

We discussed during the meeting today that this is not normative change for the specification. There were no concerns:

Attendees
Morgan McLean
Alois Reitbauer (Dynatrace)
Ted Young
Sergey Kanzhelev
Justin Foote
Yuri Shkuro
Matthew Wear
Christoph Neumüller
Zeke Rosenberg
Isobel Reidelmeir
Daniel Dyla
Sergey Kanzhelev

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev merged commit b6405bc into master Nov 5, 2019
@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev deleted the sergkanz/moveQuestionableContentInInformativeSection branch November 5, 2019 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants