Fix the section on 64bit systems#356
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks @SergeyKanzhelev. One question: there was a suggestion to move this information to a "non-normative" section. Is that where this is now? Sorry for my ignorance, but I assumed the file name would be changing. |
yurishkuro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I made two suggestions to make it clear who is responsible for conversions
|
@yurishkuro Since there is such disagreement about which system should be required to upgrade or downgrade trace ids, perhaps it's better not to mention the system in this spec. I like the existing passive wording of |
|
Hi @bogdandrutu @adriancole @tylerbenson @jcchavezs @nicmunroe @reyang @danielkhan . There are no surprises in this PR. I believe it is reflecting overall agreement on how interoperability must work. If you have some time - please review. Thank you! |
|
Thank you everybody for reviews! |
Fixes #349
Fixes #337