Skip to content

Group pseudo nodes by the node the referred to and their address in grouped topologies.#116

Merged
tomwilkie merged 4 commits intoweaveworks:masterfrom
tomwilkie:105-grouping-pseudo
May 27, 2015
Merged

Group pseudo nodes by the node the referred to and their address in grouped topologies.#116
tomwilkie merged 4 commits intoweaveworks:masterfrom
tomwilkie:105-grouping-pseudo

Conversation

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #105

@tomwilkie tomwilkie changed the title Group pseudo nodes by the node the referred to and their address in g… Group pseudo nodes by the node the referred to and their address in grouped topologies. May 27, 2015
@peterbourgon
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think it's OK to have this behavior be default. Again, I want to see pseudonodes in the general case. The case where Chrome is opening a bunch of short-lived connections is an outlier.

Oops, misread.

This comment was marked as abuse.

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

This change is for grouped topologies, and stops all pseudo nodes being merged into one. So it adds more pseudo nodes....

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

And yes, in general I'm factoring out the pseudo node handling to be per-topology, so different topologies can have different concepts for pseudo nodes. So for the pid topology, we can show more, for containers, less, and hosts is pretty obvious.

@peterbourgon
Copy link
Contributor

Great! I noticed the formatLabel thing is basically dead code at this point, I'll remove that in another PR. 👍

@tomwilkie tomwilkie force-pushed the 105-grouping-pseudo branch from 7184c09 to 5a8a76e Compare May 27, 2015 09:19
@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

PTAL; I've factored out the pseudo node handling (hopefully with no semantic change)

This comment was marked as abuse.

This comment was marked as abuse.

@peterbourgon
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this is a brilliant change. 💯

@tomwilkie tomwilkie force-pushed the 105-grouping-pseudo branch from d14a9af to f4dcf93 Compare May 27, 2015 09:41
@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay one more look pls.

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also fixes #113

@tomwilkie tomwilkie force-pushed the 105-grouping-pseudo branch from f4dcf93 to 3e96983 Compare May 27, 2015 09:56
@tomwilkie tomwilkie mentioned this pull request May 27, 2015

This comment was marked as abuse.

@peterbourgon
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@tomwilkie tomwilkie force-pushed the 105-grouping-pseudo branch from 3e96983 to 0b786ae Compare May 27, 2015 10:05
tomwilkie added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2015
Group pseudo nodes by the node the referred to and their address in grouped topologies.
@tomwilkie tomwilkie merged commit 68a11db into weaveworks:master May 27, 2015
@tomwilkie tomwilkie deleted the 105-grouping-pseudo branch May 27, 2015 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

All pseudo nodes are grouped together in the "grouped" view

2 participants