You can no longer deconstruct tables and racks on help intent.

[ghost]

General Documentation

Intent of your Pull Request

This was tested.

Why is this change good for the game?

You ever try to put a screwdriver or wrench on a table or rack? You need to fucking throw it. This PR fixes that.

Wiki Documentation

Briefly describe your PR and the impacts of it, in layman's terms.

This PR makes it so you need to be on any intent besides help or harm to deconstruct racks or tables.

What should players be aware of when it comes to the changes your PR is implementing?

You need to be on any intent besides help or harm to deconstruct tables or racks.

What general grouping does this PR fall under?

Deconstruction tweaks.

Are there any aspects of the PR that you would like us not to mention on the Wiki?

If there are any numerical values involved in your PR that will be relevant to a player, please note them here.

Changelog

Edit this changelog for changes that are noticeable by the players. Remove it if this isn't the case. If you add a name after the ':cl', that name will be used in the changelog. Leave it empty to use your GitHub name. Prefix the PR title with [admin] if it's something admin related. Prefix the PR title with [s] if you are fixing an exploit so it is not announced on discord and the server.

🆑
tweak: you can no longer deconstruct tables or racks on help, use disarm or grab, harm intent to hit the table
/:cl:

[Jarod1200]

ok but arent all the other intents for smashing the table with the tool in question

[UselessTheremin]

ive never had a problem with this? just... throw the tool? being on harm intent would mean, if you are constructing things, youd probably hit them. this would just make a weird inconsistency and i dont think this is needed

[Hopekz]

I like this except it's weird to switch to grab intent to deconstruct a table (if it actually doesn't attack it like Jarod said)

[ghost]

ok but arent all the other intents for smashing the table with the tool in question

I have zero idea what you mean by this, but if you have a screwdriver or wrench you'll ideally want to deconstruct it instead of smashing it.

ive never had a problem with this? just... throw the tool? being on harm intent would mean, if you are constructing things, youd probably hit them. this would just make a weird inconsistency and i dont think this is needed

It's fairly annoying for me.

I like this except it's weird to switch to grab intent to deconstruct a table (if it actually doesn't attack it like Jarod said)

Would take some time to get used to.

[Jarod1200]

I can clarify a bit. On help you want the screwdriver to be placed on the table which is reasonable. I think either disarm or grab should be deconstructing but harm should still attack the table with the screwdriver. There are occasions where you do in fact want to break the table and sometimes you are limited in your available tools.

[Moggram]

It being on harm lines up with you needed to be on harm to weld and unweld a airlock. (just saying.)

[ghost]

I can clarify a bit. On help you want the screwdriver to be placed on the table which is reasonable. I think either disarm or grab should be deconstructing but harm should still attack the table with the screwdriver. There are occasions where you do in fact want to break the table and sometimes you are limited in your available tools.

Sure. Easy enough to code.