refactor(authority): adjust permissions to be more restrictive#2542
refactor(authority): adjust permissions to be more restrictive#2542
authority): adjust permissions to be more restrictive#2542Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates focus on enhancing security by modifying permissions and reclassifying message types within the system. Key changes involve making permission settings more restrictive and effectively reorganizing the categorization of specific message types to better align with their operational risks. This restructuring aims to bolster administrative capabilities while ensuring that high-risk messages are managed under appropriate policies. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
lumtis
added
UPGRADE_TESTS
lumtis
requested review from
brewmaster012,
fbac,
kingpinXD,
skosito,
swift1337 and
ws4charlie
as code owners
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
- x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (1 hunks)
- x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Additional comments not posted (13)
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (6)
28-28: EnsureMsgWhitelistERC20is correctly categorized under AdminPolicyMessages.Adding
MsgWhitelistERC20to the admin policy ensures that only authorized personnel can execute this operation, which is appropriate given its potential impact on the network.
31-31: Verify the categorization ofMsgRemoveForeignCoinunder AdminPolicyMessages.This message has significant implications, such as potentially deleting supply. Its inclusion in the admin policy is appropriate, but ensure that all necessary safeguards are in place.
32-32: ConfirmMsgDeployFungibleCoinZRC20is suitable for AdminPolicyMessages.Deploying fungible coins should be restricted to admin-level permissions due to its high impact. This categorization seems appropriate.
34-34: Check the impact ofMsgAddObserverunder AdminPolicyMessages.Adding observers can affect the network's monitoring and signing processes. Ensure that this categorization aligns with the intended security model.
35-35: AssessMsgRemoveChainParamsfor AdminPolicyMessages.Removing chain parameters can have critical effects. It is appropriate to restrict this operation to admin-level permissions.
39-39: ValidateMsgEnableHeaderVerificationunder AdminPolicyMessages.Enabling header verification is a sensitive operation that should be restricted to admins. This categorization is suitable.
x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (6)
419-419: ConfirmMsgWhitelistERC20is correctly moved to AdminPolicyMessageList.This change ensures that only admin-level permissions can whitelist ERC20 tokens, which is appropriate.
420-420: VerifyMsgDeployFungibleCoinZRC20is correctly moved to AdminPolicyMessageList.Deploying fungible coins should be restricted to admin-level permissions due to its high impact. This change is appropriate.
423-423: Check the movement ofMsgRemoveForeignCointo AdminPolicyMessageList.Given the significant implications of removing foreign coins, this change ensures that only authorized personnel can perform this operation.
425-425: AssessMsgAddObserverin AdminPolicyMessageList.Adding observers can affect the network's monitoring and signing processes. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended security model.
426-426: ValidateMsgRemoveChainParamsin AdminPolicyMessageList.Removing chain parameters can have critical effects. This change appropriately restricts this operation to admin-level permissions.
430-430: ConfirmMsgEnableHeaderVerificationin AdminPolicyMessageList.Enabling header verification is a sensitive operation that should be restricted to admins. This change is suitable.
changelog.md (1)
67-67: Changelog entry accurately reflects the permission changes.The entry clearly indicates that permissions have been made more restrictive, aligning with the changes in the codebase.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2542 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 46.68% 46.62% -0.06%
===========================================
Files 464 464
Lines 30781 30820 +39
===========================================
Hits 14369 14369
- Misses 15557 15596 +39
Partials 855 855
|
3 participants
Description
Closes: #2430
Add some messages under admin policy type instead of operational policy type
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes