Conversation
FlorianRappl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is superb - you are officially a rockstar 🚀 !
What are you plans with this? How should we proceed to bring this live?
| @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| <ItemGroup> | |||
| <PackageReference Include="AngleSharp" Version="0.15.0" /> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The big question is - should we make this AngleSharp 1.0.0 compatible?
We can also first release it for an older version and then upgrade it (making it also a 1.0.0).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it makes sense to target AngleSharp 1.0.0 and then make this a v1.0.0 as well.
I'll make those changes and update my PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about target frameworks? I notice that for AngleSharp v1 you target netstandard2.0;net461;net472;net6.0;net7.0;net8.0.
Should we aim for the same on this project?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aim yes, but generally libs don't need to have the same scope, e.g., AngleSharp.Io has a few things that require "more" capabilities - so it is not as general.
Appreciated that you take the update!
|
Also another question - what about #87 ? Should we bring this in (the test and fix, if that still applies)? |
|
I think #87 should be merged in |
|
Merged #87 into |
9eec319 to
7634f87
Compare
FlorianRappl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks awesome to me. Let's have the build green and have the first pre-release done.
|
We're note quite there yet. |
|
Yes, I mean it's anyway just a first preview. I've assigned some / relevant issues to the v1 milestone. I am not sure yet how much I can look into them tonight and on the weekend, but my goal would be to have a bit of focus now on AngleSharp.Js to have this as a 1.0.0. Thanks for your PR and motivating me to do so. If you want to pick up / anyway have some of these issues handled then please comment on them. Otherwise I'll just pick up whatever is left. |
|
Preview is out (https://www.nuget.org/packages/AngleSharp.Js/0.15.0-beta.16). The version is still placed at 0.15 and I also noticed that some parts of the NuGet package definition (e.g., the README) are missing: I'll add those and push to |
|
Awesome work @tomvanenckevort ! I'll hopefully have some timesoon too to check this out and investigate if there's something that Jint could improve too. Just have to get back from vacation first 😄 |
|
Preview is out (https://www.nuget.org/packages/AngleSharp.Js/1.0.0-beta.20); incl. latest target frameworks, correct reference to Jint and AngleSharp, README etc. I think from the infrastructure POV we are done, now we "only" need to clear the outstanding issues and have it (draw the rest of the owl). |

Types of Changes
Prerequisites
Please make sure you can check the following two boxes:
Contribution Type
What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an
xin all the boxes that apply:Description
As discussed in #84 this PR is to cover the upgrade of AngleSharp.Js to use Jint v3.
Changes made:
FunctionInstance>Function) to match the changes made in Jint v3.EngineInstanceto remove the lexical and variable environments since those are no longer public in Jint v3. Instead there is now a globalwindowobject which also gets exposed on the global object (to ensure that things likewindow.location.hrefandlocation.hrefresolve to the same thing).ConsoleInstancewith a newConsoleclass that ties it directly to the Window object (as per JS spec).DomDelegateInstance>ClrFunction).Also a shoutout to @lahma for providing some guidance and older test code that helped me figure out the global object changes. 👍