Skip to content

Conversation

@michael-hawker
Copy link
Member

Quick test to evaluate the footprint of this individual control on the package.

Based off PR #3727

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 5, 2021

Thanks michael-hawker for opening a Pull Request! The reviewers will test the PR and highlight if there is any conflict or changes required. If the PR is approved we will proceed to merge the pull request 🙌

@ghost ghost requested review from Kyaa-dost, Rosuavio and azchohfi February 5, 2021 08:20
@michael-hawker michael-hawker reopened this Feb 5, 2021
@michael-hawker
Copy link
Member Author

@nmetulev @azchohfi @vgromfeld this is the culprit!!! Over 750kb difference in our test environment on the optimized app footprint.

Finishing my last analysis in #3731 as well, but will follow-up for our next steps soon.

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2021
Quick test to evaluate the footprint of this individual control on the package.

Based off PR #3727

Comparing against #3733, wondering if it's this single API or not that has an effect, as everything else seems rather common or using other things already being used in other APIs in the Toolkit...

Updated as we identified the custom caching in #2486 is the culprit to the application footprint. Reverting to just use System Cache with the applied fix still to evaluate final impact again with compiled dlls.

This should save around **675kb** to optimized app footprint.

Also Fixes #3741 removing unused element.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants