Edge-to-edge Bottom Safe Area Padding: Workspace screens

[chrispader]

Explanation of Change

Based on changes from #57128

Applies the flags for updated bottom safe area padding in workspace screens (including showcase of keyboard handling).

Fixed Issues

$ #53186
PROPOSAL:

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Go through all workspace screens and check if the bottom safe area handling has changed.

More details in #57281 (comment)

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

[melvin-bot]

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

[github-actions]

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. ⚠️

[github-actions]

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. ⚠️

[github-actions]

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. ⚠️

[github-actions]

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. ⚠️

[chrispader]

@shubham1206agra mentioned one remaining issue with the Android three-button navigation bar here.

This is caused by some RN-internal logic and i couldn't find a quick fix. I would suggest not to hold on this issue and i'll try to fix it in a follow-up PR.

@mountiny Again, this is still an issue, but we'll fix this in a follow-up PR to not hold this PR any longer.

[github-actions]

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

[mountiny]

Looking forwards to cleaning this up as now all the params make it quite messy but the end goal is worth it

[mountiny]

Again, this is still an issue, but we'll fix this in a follow-up PR to not hold this PR any longer.

I dont think we have to hold on that one

Making a new build to test this a bit but also gotta wait for @lakchote

[lakchote]

One typo to fix other than that LGTM @chrispader

[github-actions]

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
Android 🤖🔄	iOS 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/57281-hybrid/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/57281-hybrid/index.html
Desktop 💻	Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/57281/NewExpensify.dmg	https://57281.pr-testing.expensify.com

---

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

[mountiny]

Tested well on web and ios 🎉 but dont have physical android device yet that is where the main testing will be I think

[melvin-bot]

@mountiny looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[mountiny]

This was a large pr so we omitted the checks for optional es lint rules

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.28-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[IuliiaHerets]

This PR is failing for mWeb because of issue #60266

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.1.28-15 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[jayeshmangwani]

Coming from this issue #63978, We missed updating the enableEdgeToEdgeBottomSafeAreaPadding prop on a few pages (EnterSageIntacctCredentialsPage, SageIntacctPrerequisitesPage and RequireQuickBooksDesktopPage), which led to double bottom padding.

For the NetSuiteTokenInputForm page had the bottom safe area padding applied twice , once from the FormProvider and again from the ConnectionLayout. To fix this, we've explicitly set it to false in the FormProvider. More details can be found here: #63978 (comment)