Skip to content

Allow users to export report as PDF#57323

Merged
grgia merged 49 commits intomainfrom
alberto-pdfExport
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Allow users to export report as PDF#57323
grgia merged 49 commits intomainfrom
alberto-pdfExport

Conversation

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor

@Gonals Gonals commented Feb 24, 2025

HELD https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/45644

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #55810
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Log into NewDot and create some expenses in a workspace
  2. Open the expense report and click on the header. The right hand summary should open, and the "Download as PDF" Option should be there:
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 17 25 PM
  1. Click it. A modal should show up:
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 18 32 PM
  1. After a bit, it should error (because we are in Dev and PDFs aren't generated there):
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 19 25 PM
  1. Repeat the steps 1-3 using staging as the backend (no NGROK).
  2. After a bit, the "Download" button should show. Click it. The file should download
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Offline, clicking the "Download as PDF" button should show a modal blocking the flow.

QA Steps

  1. Log into NewDot and create some expenses in a workspace
  2. Open the expense report and click on the header. The right hand summary should open, and the "Download as PDF" Option should be there:
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 17 25 PM
  1. Click it. A modal should show up:
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 18 32 PM
  1. After a bit, the "Download" button should show. Click it. The file should download
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 17 25 PM Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 3 18 32 PM
MacOS: Desktop

@Gonals Gonals self-assigned this Feb 24, 2025
@Gonals Gonals requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2025 14:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

@dubielzyk-expensify @ishpaul777 One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 24, 2025 14:23
@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Feb 25, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-03-04.at.2.49.39.AM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-03-02.at.10.58.53.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-03-04.at.2.30.48.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-03-02.at.10.58.31.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-03-02.at.10.43.16.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-03-04.at.2.24.08.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-03-02.at.11.01.30.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

oh i thought this is still WIP because it shows gray on K2, that's why left partial review, I am on it today!

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

Bug: offline modal only visible when the generating PDF modal is dismissed

Screen.Recording.2025-02-26.at.2.21.03.AM.mov

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

Some small comments, Overall looks great! also we have some lint checks failing @Gonals

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Feb 26, 2025

oh i thought this is still WIP because it shows gray on K2, that's why left partial review, I am on it today!

It is still on WIP! 😆

@Gonals Gonals force-pushed the alberto-pdfExport branch 2 times, most recently from 5f7b338 to a334576 Compare February 26, 2025 14:08
@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@Gonals I was thinking if it would be possible to redirect user to browser with expensify.com/fileaLinkurl only on Android native as workaround until we figure out the problem at root? Is that viable idea

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Mar 10, 2025

@Gonals I was thinking if it would be possible to redirect user to browser with expensify.com/fileaLinkurl only on Android native as workaround until we figure out the problem at root? Is that viable idea

Potentially, but I'm going to try one more thing. I still have half a feeling this is all because we are in dev. I have put everything behind a beta, so we could deploy with Android as-is (because it should work, as we do the exact same thing in another place) nd see what happens in staging. If it doesn't work there, then we figure out what's up and fix it.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @Gonals has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/57323/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/57323/index.html
Android iOS
Android Hybrid 🤖🔄 iOS Hybrid 🍎🔄
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
N/A N/A
N/A N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Mar 10, 2025

@Gonals I was thinking if it would be possible to redirect user to browser with expensify.com/fileaLinkurl only on Android native as workaround until we figure out the problem at root? Is that viable idea

Potentially, but I'm going to try one more thing. I still have half a feeling this is all because we are in dev. I have put everything behind a beta, so we could deploy with Android as-is (because it should work, as we do the exact same thing in another place) nd see what happens in staging. If it doesn't work there, then we figure out what's up and fix it.

Let's make sure everything else works as expected and give that a shot, then

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

Everything else looks good, works well 🚀

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Mar 11, 2025

Everything else looks good, works well 🚀

Neat, then can you approve? 😁

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia March 11, 2025 12:24
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2025

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@grgia grgia merged commit 5413130 into main Mar 11, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@grgia grgia deleted the alberto-pdfExport branch March 11, 2025 14:44
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.1.12-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@lanitochka17
Copy link

@Gonals Hello
The option Download as PDF is not available for Gmail accounts. Is it expected?

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

Already got linked but looks like this isn't quite working right - #58302 - seems like maybe we need to handle this with a shortLivedAuthToken or something on the Old Dot side?

Let me know if this is a blocker or we can move forward

@izarutskaya
Copy link

izarutskaya commented Mar 13, 2025

@dangrous @Gonals PR is failing with issues #58302, #58285

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Mar 13, 2025

@Gonals Hello The option Download as PDF is not available for Gmail accounts. Is it expected?

Yes, it is behind a beta

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonals commented Mar 13, 2025

@dangrous @Gonals PR is failing with issues #58302, #58285

Yes. I'm on it. We don't need to block deploy, though, as this is behind a beta

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.12-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

const baseURL = addTrailingForwardSlash(getOldDotURLFromEnvironment(environment));
const downloadFileName = `${reportName}.pdf`;
const pdfURL = `${baseURL}secure?secureType=pdfreport&filename=${fileName}&downloadName=${downloadFileName}`;
fileDownload(pdfURL, downloadFileName, '', Browser.isMobileSafari());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can explicitly pass true to the 3rd argument when calling this function to treat App downloads as an external link to avoid the CORS issue. More details here #61937 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants