Skip to content

Conversation

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented May 28, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #62931
$ #62947
$ #62971
$ #62969
$ #62982
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Test 1
  1. Go to /settings/workspaces/AE7DCE11CDAF1CAF/company-cards/vcf/assign-card/transaction-start-date
  2. Select a date > Verify the clear button is centred
  3. Clear the date > Verify the calendar icon is centred
  • Test 2
  1. Go to Account > Profile > Status.
  2. Click Clear after.
  3. Click Custom > Time.
  4. Verify there is no spacing after hours input
  • Test 3
    Onboard with private domain email (Domain used should have existing account)
    Observe the private domain (People you may know) modal displayed
    Verify there is padding between the subtitle & the text inputs in people you may know modal

  • Test 4

  1. Sign up with a new account
  2. Skip "What's your work email?"
  3. Tap "Something else"
  4. Add something in "First name?"
  5. Verify placeholders for the new text inputs are centered in test drive screen
  • Test 5
  1. Go to search > Filter > From
  2. Select an account that has no display name, only email; or an account whose name contains no space and is long (e.g., "LoremIpsumDummyText" (create one if needed)
  3. Observe that the search input does not contain the "from:" query
  4. Verify search input contains the "from:" query
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  • Same as tests, some of the tests requires internet.

QA Steps

  • Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-app.mp4

… of input modal.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2025 16:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 28, 2025

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dominictb May 28, 2025 16:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 28, 2025

@dominictb Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team May 28, 2025 16:23
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as draft May 28, 2025 16:24
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
…may know modal.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 FYI we can combine all the regressions fixes into 1 PR for better follow-ups.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
…ive screen.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2025 18:17
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb, all the linked issues are fixed. This one is the only one remaining, which I’ve planned to fix separately.

cc: @Expensify/design

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Krishna! @dominictb let's get this into final review when you get a moment, thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @shawnborton has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
Android 🤖🔄 iOS 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/62976-hybrid/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/62976-hybrid/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/62976/NewExpensify.dmg https://62976.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I mean... How nit picky should I get? It looks like it's 1px off center 😅

CleanShot 2025-05-28 at 15 29 20@2x

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

In my opinion, 1px off center = not a deploy blocker anymore, then we can take our time getting to 0 px off center 😬 thoughts??

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Krishna2323 commented May 28, 2025

@Beamanator, yes I don't think we should block on that.

EDIT: BTW that isn't caused by this or the original PR, it's the icon size due to which we see difference between both icons.

Monosnap.screencast.2025-05-29.02-27-21.mp4

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

dannymcclain commented May 28, 2025

In my opinion, 1px off center = not a deploy blocker anymore, then we can take our time getting to 0 px off center 😬 thoughts??

Definitely agree! Not a deploy blocker!

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Any updates @dominictb ? 🙏

return maxAutoGrowHeight ? {maxHeight: maxAutoGrowHeight - styles.textInputMultilineContainer.paddingTop - styles.textInputContainer.borderWidth * 2} : {};
},

getTextInputIconContainerStyles: (hasLabel: boolean, includePadding = true) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a comment here explaining WHY and WHEN we need this; and the params' meaning

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added.

disableKeyboard={disableKeyboard}
inputStyle={style}
textInputContainerStyles={[styles.p0, containerStyle]}
textInputContainerStyles={[containerStyle]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
textInputContainerStyles={[containerStyle]}
textInputContainerStyles={containerStyle}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated.

/** Customize the TextInput container */
textInputContainerStyles?: StyleProp<ViewStyle>;

/** Whether to apply padding to the input */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a comment explain WHY and WHEN we need this prop

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

setWidth((prevWidth: number | null) => (autoGrowHeight ? layout.width : prevWidth));
setHeight((prevHeight: number) =>
!multiline ? layout.height + heightToFitEmojis - (styles.textInputContainer.padding + styles.textInputContainer.borderWidth * 2) : prevHeight,
!multiline ? layout.height + heightToFitEmojis - ((hasLabel ? styles.textInputContainer.padding : 0) + styles.textInputContainer.borderWidth * 2) : prevHeight,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extract variables for these: labelPadding, borderWidth

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

{!!inputProps.secureTextEntry && (
<Checkbox
style={[styles.flex1, styles.textInputIconContainer]}
style={[styles.flex1, StyleUtils.getTextInputIconContainerStyles(hasLabel)]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BUG: View password icon is not middle aligned vertically:

Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 05 17 32

On production:

Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 05 18 36

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 are you online to address the PR review?

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Beamanator, yep! 🙃 I've addressed all the comments.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Wow thanks so much @Krishna2323 !

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

dominictb commented May 29, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Screenshot_1748479019
Screenshot_1748479037
Screenshot_1748479088
Screenshot_1748479255
Screenshot_1748479292

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screenshot_1748479394
Screenshot_1748479405
Screenshot_1748479551
Screenshot_1748479590
Screenshot_1748479664

iOS: HybridApp

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 29 28
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 27 27
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 26 31
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 26 28
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 23 22
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 23 17
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 23 14
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 22 21
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 22 09
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 22 06

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 31 08
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 31 24
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 31 51
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 32 57
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 33 00
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 33 46
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 34 21
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-05-29 at 07 34 30

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 09 23
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 09 18
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 09 15
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 08 15
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 08 09
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 17 20
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 16 40
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 12 57

MacOS: Desktop

Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 19 17
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 19 07
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 18 33
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 18 32
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 18 26
Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 18 07

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

dominictb commented May 29, 2025

@Krishna2323 Text input with currency prefix is misaligned, only on mWeb Chrome.

Screenshot 2025-05-29 at 07 45 03

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

dominictb commented May 29, 2025

I've tested everywhere and the above bug should be the last one.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Oofda that's such a small misalignment, i'm tempted to merge 🙈 But i can let this go till morning i guess 😅 (since we have another blocker still open)

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Let's try to address this one too: #63010

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Let's fix the misalignment above if we have some time this morning. cc @Krishna2323 @dominictb what's the overall status here?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 another quick thing - can you check the border color on the input of the reports page? It feels quite light to me, almost as if it's using the wrong value - it should use our theme value for borders:
CleanShot 2025-05-29 at 09 06 44@2x

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

#63010 was already fixed in this PR.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 what are the next steps here? Do you plan to make a fresh new PR from your old branch that was reverted?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton, the new PR with the reverted changes and the fix for the regressions is here. I'm working on the fix for the last issue, as well as this and this comment. I’ll try to address those within 2 hours so we have a good chance of merging that today.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good, let's close this one out then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants