Skip to content

Migrate Quickbooks and Xero flow modals to use Reanimated modal#65172

Merged
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/use-reac-native-reanimated-in-xero-and-quickbooks-modals
Jul 4, 2025
Merged

Migrate Quickbooks and Xero flow modals to use Reanimated modal#65172
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/use-reac-native-reanimated-in-xero-and-quickbooks-modals

Conversation

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jmusial jmusial commented Jun 30, 2025

Explanation of Change

This PR uses react-native-reanimated based modal for CENTERED_UNSWIPABLE type modals.

Animations used

  • slideInRight / slideOutRight for small screens
  • fadeIn / fadeOut for large screens

Fixed Issues

$ #64776
$ #64775

Depends on

#64805

PROPOSAL:

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C05LX9D6E07/p1750147058498549

Tests

Feature Training Modal

Only on large screen devices. On small screens Feature Training Modal uses Bottom Docked, which has already beed migrated.

  1. Log in with a new Gmail account.
  2. Tap Skip on work email page.
  3. Select Track and budget expenses.
  4. Enter name > Continue.
  5. "Take us for a test drive" modal appears correctly

Xero and QuickBooks Online Modals

Only on native devices. On desktop and web integrations open in a web browser card.

  1. Log into an account with 2FA
  2. Create a new workspace or use existing one with Accounting enabled
  3. Go to Workspaces -> Your workspace -> Accounting
  4. Click Connect on QuickBooks Online row -> Modal shows
  5. Click Connect on Xero row -> Modal shows

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Xero & Quickbooks Online

0024.xero.quicbooks.android.native.mov

Feature Training

N/A (is another modal type)

Android: mWeb Chrome

Xero & Quickbooks Online

N/A (opens link in another browser tab)

Feature Training

N/A (is another modal type)

iOS: Native

Xero & Quickbooks Online

0024.xero.quickbooks.native.ios.mp4

Feature Training

N/A (is another modal type)

iOS: mWeb Safari

Xero & Quickbooks Online

N/A (opens link in another browser tab)

Feature Training

N/A (is another modal type)

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Xero & Quickbooks Online

N/A (opens link in another browser tab)

Feature Training

0024.web.chrome.feature.training.mov
MacOS: Desktop

Xero & Quickbooks Online

N/A (opens link in another browser tab)

Feature Training

0024.desktop.native.feature.mov

Comment on lines +50 to +58
if (type && PARTIAL_REANIMATED_MODAL_TYPES.includes(type) && shouldUseReanimatedModal) {
return (
<ReanimatedModal
// eslint-disable-next-line react/jsx-props-no-spreading
{...(props as ReanimatedModalProps)}
type={type}
/>
);
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: What if we remove PARTIAL_REANIMATED_MODAL_TYPES and just rely on shouldUseReanimatedModal?

This way we would end up with just one if:

    if ((type && REANIMATED_MODAL_TYPES.includes(type)) || shouldUseReanimatedModal)

Comment on lines +25 to +33
case 'fadeIn':
default:
return {
from: {opacity: 0},
to: {
opacity: 0.72,
easing,
},
};
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: Split 'fadeIn' and default to make the logic clearer and better catch unintended animation types

Suggested change
case 'fadeIn':
default:
return {
from: {opacity: 0},
to: {
opacity: 0.72,
easing,
},
};
case 'fadeIn':
return {
from: {opacity: 0},
to: {
opacity: 0.72,
easing,
},
};
default:
throw ...

},
};
case 'fadeOut':
default:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh this is so much cleaner, good job!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@jmusial jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2025 09:44
@jmusial jmusial requested review from a team as code owners July 1, 2025 09:44
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ZhenjaHorbach and removed request for a team July 1, 2025 09:44
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@jmusial jmusial force-pushed the feat/use-reac-native-reanimated-in-xero-and-quickbooks-modals branch from 037b3c5 to a952677 Compare July 1, 2025 15:06
@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 1, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-web.mov
iOS: HybridApp
ios-1.mov
ios-2.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2025-07-02.20.58.50.mov
MacOS: Desktop
2025-07-02.20.58.50.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 2, 2025

Noticed that when we hover over the background, instead of default cursor, we see the selection cursor (on staging we have default cursor )

Снимок экрана 2025-07-02 в 21 01 30

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 3, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach changed

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 3, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach changed

Thanks !

Weird
When I try to open native apps
I'm stuck on splash screens

@mountiny
Could you please trigger adhoc builds ?
while I'm trying to figure out what's going on 😅

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 3, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach merged latest main. I think that should fix the "stuck on splash screens" issue

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 3, 2025

Interesting issue after finishing onboarding

2025-07-03.16.23.57.mov

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 3, 2025

Weird, I cannot reproduce it :( What IOS version is that ?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Weird, I cannot reproduce it :( What IOS version is that ?

17.5 😅
But yeah
It's a bit difficult to reproduce

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

Hmm... I see, are you able to get some repro steps or it was a one time glitch ?

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach I managed to get that behaviour, but on the main branch :(

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach I managed to get that behaviour, but on the main branch :(

Oh
Interesting
I checked it on main yesterday
And couldn't reproduce it

But in that case it's not our issue !

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

I think I found repro steps. It happens for me on the first account I set up after opening a new emulator, the consecutive accounts are working fine.

Gonna check on real device.

Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.10.27.26.mov

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

I can reproduce it on main on a real device with the same scenario. Gonna post it on slack on bugs channel.

Edit: https://swmansion.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1751623695654159

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach would be awesome if you could check the PR today, we have 3 more lined up depending on this one 😄

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will complete soon !

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 4, 2025

@jmusial
Do you have this issue ?
When I create a new account and when I reopen the app on splash screen
The app is not responding

2025-07-04.13.04.39.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 4, 2025

But actually when I press android system back button
The app starts working
So I suppose we have an open invisible modal (I'm pretty sure it's Take us for a test drive modal )

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

Soo.... I think it's also on main
On android, when creating new account after finishing the onboarding flow app is unresponsive untill
Android back button press.

Can you check if you can get in on main as well ?

Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.15.56.57.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes
Let me check

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

Prod works fine.
I mean it's unlikely that this PR would cause this, since it's only changing Take us for a test drive (FutureTraining) modal for wide/medium screens. On narrow ones it's a BOTTOM_DOCKED which has been merged months ago :)

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 4, 2025

Prod works fine. I mean it's unlikely that this PR would cause this, since it's only changing Take us for a test drive (FutureTraining) modal for wide/medium screens. On narrow ones it's a BOTTOM_DOCKED which has been merged months ago :)

Yeah
Looks like we need to report another bug 😅

And good point
I didn't think that this mobile modal doesn't apply to new changes

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In this case
LGTM !

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny July 4, 2025 14:14
@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 4, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach I can post it later, unless you want it :)
Awesome job testing !

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach I can post it later, unless you want it :) Awesome job testing !

I already did it 😅

And good job !

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice great job on the PR and testing!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 3eca548 into Expensify:main Jul 4, 2025
20 of 21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 4, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.77-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.77-2 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants