Skip to content

Fix: Taxes page still shown when disable the taxes from other browser#76611

Merged
puneetlath merged 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
ryntgh:issue-75861
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

Fix: Taxes page still shown when disable the taxes from other browser#76611
puneetlath merged 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
ryntgh:issue-75861

Conversation

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh ryntgh commented Dec 3, 2025

Explanation of Change

This PR adds isFocused to the dependency array of the useEffect that handles navigation when a feature is disabled, so that the user is navigated to the More features page when the RHP is opened

Fixed Issues

$ #75861
PROPOSAL: #75861 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

  1. Open any workspace > More features > Enable taxes
  2. Click on Taxes
  3. Click on a tax rate
  4. From the other browser, disable the taxes from the More features page
  5. Back to the first browser observe workspace setting page
  6. Verify that the Taxes page has completely disappeared after disabling taxes in the other browser
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android-Native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android-mWeb.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS-Native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS-mWeb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS-Chrome.mp4

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ages/workspace/categories/ImportCategoriesPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/rules/RulesCustomPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...orkspace/tags/ImportMultiLevelTagsSettingsPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/tags/ImportTagsOptionsPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/tags/ImportTagsPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/tags/TagGLCodePage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...orkspace/workflows/WorkspaceWorkflowsPayerPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/perDiem/ImportPerDiemPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/AccessOrNotFoundWrapper.tsx 74.54% <0.00%> (-1.39%) ⬇️
... and 2 more
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@ryntgh ryntgh marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 06:28
@ryntgh ryntgh requested review from a team as code owners December 4, 2025 06:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Krishna2323 and joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team December 4, 2025 06:28
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@Krishna2323 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryntgh does this fix address this bug for all features on the more features page?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

does this fix address this bug for all features on the more features page?

@joekaufmanexpensify yes, it fixes all features pages.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh the tag import page is not closing sometimes — could you please check? Could you also thoroughly test all the other features again? I think I’ve seen the same issue on one more page. Thanks!

Monosnap.screencast.2025-12-05.16-42-27.mp4

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh the above bug happens probably because we haven't passed featureName prop to AccessOrNotFoundWrapper in ImportTagsPage and similar tag import page.

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Dec 7, 2025

@Krishna2323 thanks for pointing this out! I’ll look into this tomorrow

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh bump

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Dec 9, 2025

@Krishna2323 Sorry for the late response, I've updated the PR

I also found the same navigation case in WorkspaceUpgradePage (upgrade-to-control modal) and added a useEffect mirroring AccessOrNotFoundWrapper behavior. Do you think we should handle it there too? If so, do you think this is the right approach?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh there are two more components that use AccessOrNotFoundWrapper without the featureName prop: WorkspaceWorkflowsPayerPage and RulesCustomPage. Please update those and remove the changes from WorkspaceUpgradePage — I don’t think we should worry about that since it’s a rare edge case. Keen to hear your view on this, @puneetlath. Thank you!

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Dec 10, 2025

@Krishna2323 Thanks for the feedback! I've updated the PR accordingly

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath the AddNewCardPage is missing the AccessOrNotFoundWrapper. Should we update that in this PR? Let me know your thoughts, and we can make the change here. I’ll complete the checklist in an hour.

This would ensure consistent access control with other company cards pages and fix the bug where the page doesn't navigate away when the feature is disabled from another browser.

Looking at the codebase, most company cards pages are wrapped with AccessOrNotFoundWrapper:

Page Has AccessOrNotFoundWrapper?
WorkspaceCompanyCardsPage.tsx ✅ Yes
WorkspaceCompanyCardFeedSelectorPage.tsx ✅ Yes
WorkspaceCompanyCardDetailsPage.tsx ✅ Yes
WorkspaceCompanyCardsSettingsPage.tsx ✅ Yes
assignCard/CardNameStep.tsx ✅ Yes
addNew/AddNewCardPage.tsx No

Current Protection in AddNewCardPage.tsx

The page only has:

  1. withPolicyAndFullscreenLoading HOC - provides policy data and loading state
  2. DelegateNoAccessWrapper - blocks delegate access
  3. isBlockedToAddNewFeeds redirect - redirects to upgrade page if blocked

What's Missing

Without AccessOrNotFoundWrapper, the page can be accessed directly via URL (/workspaces/:policyID/company-cards/add-card-feed) even if:

  1. The user is not a policy admin
  2. The company cards feature is disabled
  3. The feature gets disabled while user is on this flow

This appears to be an oversight. The AddNewCardPage.tsx should probably be wrapped with:

<AccessOrNotFoundWrapper
    policyID={policyID}
    accessVariants={[CONST.POLICY.ACCESS_VARIANTS.ADMIN, CONST.POLICY.ACCESS_VARIANTS.PAID]}
    featureName={CONST.POLICY.MORE_FEATURES.ARE_COMPANY_CARDS_ENABLED}
>
    {/* current content */}
</AccessOrNotFoundWrapper>

@Krishna2323

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented Dec 12, 2025

@ryntgh on the iOS app, I briefly see a blank screen. Could you please check that? It can also be seen in your iOS native recording.

ios_native.mp4

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Dec 14, 2025

Oh yeah, it looks like iOS native has a blank screen issue when opening any page from the selected feature page. I’ll investigate this tomorrow morning

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Dec 19, 2025

@Krishna2323 Sure, I've updated the PR to use setNavigationActionToMicrotaskQueue instead. I've also re-tested the changes on all platforms and can confirm everything works as expected

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath, could you please check this comment and the recordings below? On native platforms, we first go back to the Feature page and then to the More Features page. This is for fixing #76611 (comment).

iOS: HybridApp
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath friendly bump!

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the delay. It makes sense to me to address that if it's relevant to what we're doing here.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh could you please fix AddNewCardPage? #76611 (comment)

On native platforms, we first go back to the Feature page and then to the More Features page.

@puneetlath what about this^—are we fine with it?

iOS: HybridApp
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Jan 8, 2026

could you please fix AddNewCardPage?

Sorry for the delay, I've updated the PR

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@ryntgh why did you added AccessOrNotFoundWrapper in PublicDomainErrorPage?

@ryntgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryntgh commented Jan 9, 2026

@Krishna2323 Since the Travel feature is currently available on the More features page, I think we should address this, as users with a public domain can easily access PublicDomainErrorPage. When a user with a public domain attempts to get started with the Travel feature by clicking the "Let's go" button (the only button on the page), the PublicDomainErrorPage is displayed

Screenshot 2026-01-09 at 22 30 50

But I'm not entirely sure if this is necessary, since it's an error page shown during the Travel flow. Should we wrap it, or is this edge case acceptable? What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! 🚀

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath January 10, 2026 15:04
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath please check this comment before merging. Thanks!

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented Jan 14, 2026

@puneetlath friendly bump!

Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm good with it. Sorry for the delay!

@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit d02c688 into Expensify:main Jan 14, 2026
31 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.3.3-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.3.3-8 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

<AccessOrNotFoundWrapper
policyID={policyID}
accessVariants={[CONST.POLICY.ACCESS_VARIANTS.ADMIN, CONST.POLICY.ACCESS_VARIANTS.PAID]}
featureName={CONST.POLICY.MORE_FEATURES.ARE_RULES_ENABLED}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The page is not related to the Rules feature. Fixed in #81313.

function PublicDomainErrorPage({route}: PublicDomainErrorPageProps) {
const styles = useThemeStyles();
const {translate} = useLocalize();
const [activePolicyID] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_ACTIVE_POLICY_ID, {canBeMissing: true});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comes from #82773. We can't activate the policy ID here because the active policy ID is not the policy of the currently opened workspace. We should use the policy ID of the current workspace by passing it as a parameter.

testID="PublicDomainErrorPage"
<AccessOrNotFoundWrapper
policyID={activePolicyID}
featureName={CONST.POLICY.MORE_FEATURES.IS_TRAVEL_ENABLED}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to show this page no matter whether Travel is enabled (see #82472). Fixed in #83663.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants