Skip to content

fix: revert revert taxes field#78358

Merged
cristipaval merged 24 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feat/72238-taxes-field-v3
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

fix: revert revert taxes field#78358
cristipaval merged 24 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feat/72238-taxes-field-v3

Conversation

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 koko57 commented Dec 23, 2025

Reapplying changes from #74441 reverted in #76502 and then in #77741

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #72238
$ #77621
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Prerequisites: SelfDM, create several tracked expenses

Tracked Expenses

User with no workspace / User with several non-default workspaces

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Go to an expense
  3. Verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are NOT displayed

User with a default workspace / only one non-default workspace

Taxes not enabled

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Go to an expense
  3. Verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are NOT displayed

Taxes enabled

  1. Be invited to a workspace with Taxes enabled
    OR
  2. Go to the default/only workspace More features settings
  3. Enable Taxes
  4. Go to selfDM
  5. Go to an expense
  6. Verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are displayed
  7. Click on the Tax field, verify that the Tax selector opens
  8. Verify that you can choose a tax rate, the selector closes, and the chosen tax rate is displayed in the Tax field
  9. Click on the Tax Amount field
  10. Verify that Tax Amount screen appears (in RHP)
  11. Verify that you can change the value to a smaller amount and submit the change
  12. Go back to the selfDM
  13. Click "Submit to someone" under the expense you've just visited
  14. Choose a workspace (the default one)
  15. Verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields values are set to the values chosen in step 10 and 13

Submitting the expense to the default workspace

  1. Go back to self DM or in the expense with tax rate set open the expense details
  2. Click Submit to someone
  3. Choose the default workspace
  4. Verify that on the confirmation page the tax rate and tax amount values are preserved from the self DM expense
  5. Submit the expense, verify that no error appears

Prerequisites: another workspace with taxes enabled
Submitting the expense to a different workspace with taxes enabled

  1. Add a new tax rate to the default workspace
  2. Create a new tracked expense
  3. Set the tax rate to the newly created one
  4. Go back to self DM or in the expense with tax rate set open the expense details
  5. Click Submit to someone
  6. Choose a different workspace with tax enabled
  7. Verify that on the confirmation page the tax rate and tax amount values are preserved from the self DM expense
  8. Fill in the merchant
  9. Click "Create X expense"
  10. Verify that you see the error for the tax rate
  11. Change the tax rate
  12. Verify that after changing the tax rate no error appears and you can submit the expense

Creating a tracked expense

User with no workspace / User with several non-default workspaces

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Click Composer + -> Create expense
  3. On the Confirmation step, verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are NOT displayed

User with a default workspace / only one non-default workspace

Taxes not enabled

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Click Composer + -> Create expense
  3. On the Confirmation step, verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are NOT displayed

Taxes enabled

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Click Composer + -> Create expense
  3. On the Confirmation step, verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are displayed
  4. Click on the Tax field, verify that the Tax selector opens
  5. Verify that you can choose a tax rate, the selector closes, and the chosen tax rate is displayed in the Tax field
  6. Click on the Tax Amount field
  7. Verify that Tax Amount screen appears (in RHP)
  8. Verify that you can change the value to a smaller amount and submit the change
  9. Submit the expense
  10. Go to the newly created expense
  11. Verify that the Tax and Tax Amount fields are set to the values you selected during the creation of the expense

Changing default workspace

Prerequisites: Workspace A (default) and Workspace B both with two tax rates (the ones that are created by default) the Tax Rate 1 in Workspace B has the value changed to a different amount (i.e. 6%)

  1. Go to selfDM
  2. Click Composer + -> Create expense
  3. In the Confirmation step choose the tax rate to Tax Rate 1
  4. Create the expense
  5. Verify that in the expense view the tax rate and the tax amount are displayed properly - the tax rate name should be Tax Rate 1
  6. Go to workspaces
  7. Set the Workspace B as a default workspace
  8. Go back to the expense you created in step 4
  9. Verify that the tax rate name is no longer Tax Rate 1, but the value is displayed

Fixed frontend issue: #76495

Prerequisites: default tax rate for a foreign currency

  1. Go to self DM
  2. Create an expense in workspace's default currency
  3. Open the expense report
  4. Go offline
  5. Click Amount, change the currency, save it
  6. Verify that the tax rate is updated to the foreign currency default tax rate

fix for #77621

Prerequisites: Account has self DM, the Workspace has enabled Tax rates feature.
Configure tax settings below in Taxes page:

  • Workspace currency default tax rate - 5%.
  • Workspace foreign default tax rate - 10%.
  1. Go to self DM
  2. Create an expense in default currency
  3. Click Submit it to someone
  4. Select the workspace with tax rates
  5. On confirm page, click Amount
  6. Change the currency and save it
  7. Verify that the tax rate is updated to the foreign default tax rate and the value is recalculated
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2025-11-06 at 14 40 56
Screen.Recording.2025-11-06.at.16.12.58.mp4
Screen.Recording.2025-11-06.at.16.12.42.mp4
Screen.Recording.2025-12-23.at.21.27.57.mp4

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...es/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepConfirmation.tsx 56.32% <100.00%> (ø)
.../components/MoneyRequestConfirmationListFooter.tsx 84.30% <87.50%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts 73.27% <85.71%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
src/libs/actions/IOU/index.ts 68.04% <66.66%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
...c/components/ReportActionItem/MoneyRequestView.tsx 0.24% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts 54.45% <50.00%> (-0.29%) ⬇️
...es/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepParticipants.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ges/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepTaxRatePage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.tsx 56.85% <72.72%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
...s/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepTaxAmountPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @cristipaval has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #78358.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ https://78358.pr-testing.expensify.com
The build for Desktop was skipped Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@koko57 koko57 marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2025 20:29
@koko57 koko57 requested review from a team as code owners December 23, 2025 20:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from parasharrajat December 23, 2025 20:29
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team December 23, 2025 20:29
@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat this has been awaiting a review for 2 weeks. Can you do that today, please? A customer was asking about this today.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@trjExpensify This is not ready.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Can you elaborate on why maybe? It was marked as ready for review 2 weeks ago and nothing new has happened on it since.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 7, 2026

Based on the slack comment, I thought you were not confident about the solution before going on leave so I was waiting for you to come back.

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jan 7, 2026

@parasharrajat I think this one can be reviewed, as the other issue #77631 is a bit more complicated but happens only in one case when the user has workspaces with the same rate names. So I thought it could be handled separately, not to block this PR

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 7, 2026

Sounds good. Can you please update the PR title and resolve conflicts? I will get on it.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Also, can you please tell me what has changed over the last PR? As most of it is just revert so it will save me some time.

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jan 7, 2026

@parasharrajat just revert + fix for #77621

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jan 7, 2026

@parasharrajat FYI I've found an issue with the solution for #77621 - it causes another problem when changing the tax rate. I must come upwith another idea. I'll ping you when it's ready

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jan 8, 2026

@parasharrajat after fixing the issue I've found in my PR yesterday I tried to reproduce #77631 on this branch but I no longer can. Could it be because we no longer can change the participant from the confirmation page? Or my last change fixed that 🤔

Could you please also check the repro steps for #77631?

tag,
taxCode,
taxAmount,
taxAmount: Math.abs(taxAmount),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we doing this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because in some cases the amount was negative. We need to send only positive value

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if (existingCategory) {
const isExistingCategoryEnabled = policyCategories?.[existingCategory]?.enabled;
if (isExistingCategoryEnabled) {
setMoneyRequestCategory(item.transactionID, existingCategory, policy);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Earlier we were passing isMovingTransactionFromTrackExpense here as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but I straight reverted the revert. Where do you remember having it passed? Why do you suggest passing it here

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My bad, I was checking the wrong old commit probably.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 21, 2026

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: When submitting to someone to a non default workspace, the tax rate is not preserved.

21.01.2026_16.41.29_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: I can see violations are showing up in tracked expenses as well.

happening on staging as well....

21.01.2026_19.01.12_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 21, 2026

BUG: Changing default workspace, shows the wrong pre-selected tax rate on existing tracked expenses.

While offline....

21.01.2026_19.01.56_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 21, 2026

  • Creating track expenses confirmation page.
  • Created Tracked expense page.
  • Normal workspace expense confirmation.
  • Normal workspace expense page.
  • Submit to someone, value preserve in the default workspace.
  • Submit to someone, value preserve in non-default workspace. fix: revert revert taxes field #78358 (comment)
  • Change default workspace, tracked expense page.
  • No/default workspace case.
  • Submit to Taxes disabled workspace.
  • Disable taxes in default worksapce.
  • BUG: Updating tax rate offline does not work on existing tracked expenses.
  • BUG: Tax rate is not saved on the tracked expense once it is created.
  • BUG: Tax rate is not valid error does not hide when we select the correct rate.
  • [Due for payment 2025-12-11] Expense - Tax rate is blank after changing expense currency offline #76495

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: Staging: The incorrect Tax amount is calculated on FE.

Steps:

  1. Create a transaction in workpace for 1 Rupee.
  2. Be, offline Set the tax rate to 13%.
  3. Tax amount is showing 0.12.
  4. Be online, amount changes to 0.11.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: On old tracked expenses, when we switch to a workspace with taxes, the tax rate does not align with currency...

21.01.2026_20.07.08_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jan 21, 2026

@parasharrajat so now we have 3, right?
#78358 (comment)
#78358 (comment)
#78358 (comment)

the one with tax amount change - I guess BE does rounding a bit different than FE, but it looks like an old issue 😃

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: Staging: The incorrect Tax amount is calculated on FE.

This one is present on staging... Not ours.

@cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat so now we have 3, right? #78358 (comment) #78358 (comment) #78358 (comment)

the one with tax amount change - I guess BE does rounding a bit different than FE, but it looks like an old issue 😃

Let's not block on these. One of them is already in staging, and the others are NABs that occur in very rare use cases. GIven that we got a lot of conflicts coming in the meantime, I'd suggest we merge this as it is and fixe these NABs in a follow-up

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 21, 2026

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

21.01.2026_23.17.02_REC.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

21.01.2026_23.26.14_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

21.01.2026_23.12.55_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / Chrome

🔲 Android / native

21.01.2026_23.33.31_REC.mp4

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from cristipaval January 21, 2026 17:57
@cristipaval cristipaval merged commit 5b76720 into Expensify:main Jan 21, 2026
29 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.6-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@jponikarchuk
Copy link

This PR failing because of an issue
This issue is reproducible in: All platforms

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.3.6-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants