Skip to content

fix: Screen Reader: Workspace: 3-dot More button in Workspace container not focusable or operable#83324

Merged
yuwenmemon merged 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
TaduJR:fix-Accessibility-Tracking-Make-Element-Focusable
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

fix: Screen Reader: Workspace: 3-dot More button in Workspace container not focusable or operable#83324
yuwenmemon merged 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
TaduJR:fix-Accessibility-Tracking-Make-Element-Focusable

Conversation

@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor

@TaduJR TaduJR commented Feb 24, 2026

Explanation of Change

The parent PressableWithoutFeedback in WorkspacesListPage.tsx defaults to accessible={true}, which groups all children into a single VoiceOver element — making the ThreeDotsMenu invisible to screen readers.

Fix:

Set accessible={false} on the parent and moved accessibility into WorkspacesListRow.tsx — the content area gets its own PressableWithoutFeedback with a descriptive label, while ThreeDotsMenu sits outside it so VoiceOver can focus both independently. Wide layout ThreeDotMenuOrPendingIcon is left untouched to preserve column alignment.

Fixed Issues

$ #77471
$ #79231
PROPOSAL: #79231 (comment)

Tests

VoiceOver (iOS) — #77471 fix:

  1. Open the app on iOS with VoiceOver enabled
  2. Navigate to the Workspaces tab
  3. Swipe right to move through workspace rows
  4. Verify each workspace row is announced with its name, owner, and type
  5. Verify the "More" (3-dot) button is focusable as a separate element right after the workspace row
  6. Double-tap the "More" button and verify the popover menu opens

Column alignment (wide layout) — #82727 regression check:
7. Open the app on web (desktop/wide viewport)
8. Go to the Workspaces list with 2+ workspaces
9. Verify Owner and Workspace Type columns are properly aligned across rows

Arrow click (wide layout) — #82739 regression check:
10. On web (desktop/wide viewport), click the arrow icon on any workspace row
11. Verify it navigates to the workspace page

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen_Recording_20260224_172300_New.Expensify.Dev.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen_Recording_20260224_172721_Chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-02-24.at.4.57.28.in.the.afternoon.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-24.at.4.40.07.in.the.afternoon.mov

@TaduJR TaduJR requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2026 13:23
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and ikevin127 and removed request for a team February 24, 2026 13:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2026

@ikevin127 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@TaduJR TaduJR marked this pull request as draft February 24, 2026 13:23
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 62f53daf22

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@TaduJR TaduJR marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2026 14:33
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0fe3bcd87b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Feb 26, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-02-25.at.19.37.43.mov

Comment on lines +397 to +403
<PressableWithoutFeedback
onPress={onPress}
disabled={disabled}
accessible={false}
sentryLabel={CONST.SENTRY_LABEL.WORKSPACE.LIST.ROW_ARROW}
style={[styles.justifyContentCenter, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.touchableButtonImage]}
>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 High-Severity Issue - Arrow PressableWithoutFeedback with accessible={false} — no screen reader label

<PressableWithoutFeedback
    onPress={onPress}
    disabled={disabled}
    accessible={false}  // ← screen readers will completely ignore this element
    sentryLabel={CONST.SENTRY_LABEL.WORKSPACE.LIST.ROW_ARROW}
    style={[styles.justifyContentCenter, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.touchableButtonImage]}
>

Setting accessible={false} means VoiceOver and TalkBack will skip this arrow entirely. While the main row PressableWithoutFeedback has accessible={true} and handles the tap action, the arrow alone is visible as a separate interactive element for sighted mouse users.

This creates an inconsistency — sighted users can click the arrow, but screen reader users can only activate via the row. This is acceptable only if intentional, but per the ACCESSIBILITY.md guide: "ensure that the pressable component has a label".

Bug if not addressed: Minor — keyboard-only users on desktop can Tab to the arrow but get no screen reader announcement. If this is intentional (decorative duplicate), consider adding tabIndex={-1} on web to prevent keyboard focus.

Suggested fix: Either make it accessible with a label, or explicitly remove it from tab order:

// Option A: Make it accessible
<PressableWithoutFeedback
    accessible
    accessibilityLabel={translate('common.goTo')}
    role={CONST.ROLE.BUTTON}
    ...
>

// Option B: Keep it hidden but also remove from tab order (web)
<PressableWithoutFeedback
    accessible={false}
    tabIndex={-1}
    ...
>

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Setting accessible={false} means VoiceOver and TalkBack will skip this arrow entirely.

The fix is accessible={false} on iOS setting accessible={true} treats the container as a single element and skips the ThreeDot. So this is intentional. Adding a third VoiceOver stop (row + "More" + arrow) would be redundant

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

🟢 Reviewer checklist completed - there's a few comments that need addressed before I can approve. @TaduJR Please let me know once the code review comments are addressed so I can do a final pass on this 🙌

@TaduJR TaduJR requested review from a team and stephanieelliott as code owners February 26, 2026 10:20
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@TaduJR TaduJR force-pushed the fix-Accessibility-Tracking-Make-Element-Focusable branch from f12f512 to c9d00e9 Compare February 26, 2026 10:21
@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor Author

TaduJR commented Feb 26, 2026

🟢 Reviewer checklist completed - there's a few comments that need addressed before I can approve. @TaduJR Please let me know once the code review comments are addressed so I can do a final pass on this 🙌

Thanks so much @ikevin127

I am sorry unfortunately, made a mistake during rebase, and was forced to force-push.

It's ready for re-review

Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from yuwenmemon February 26, 2026 19:31
@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott removed their request for review February 26, 2026 22:31
@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon merged commit fc04610 into Expensify:main Mar 2, 2026
31 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 2, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

🚧 @yuwenmemon has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 2, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.3.28-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@mitarachim
Copy link

Deploy Blocker #83965 was identified to be related to this PR.

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

Hi @TaduJR. QA team failed this PR on iOS with an original issue

1772530868733.83324I.mp4

@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor Author

TaduJR commented Mar 3, 2026

Hi @TaduJR. QA team failed this PR on iOS with an #77471

Hi @IuliiaHerets

I think it's because of the revert.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 4, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.3.30-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 4, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.30-3 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants