Skip to content

fix: selected option is announced without selected state#83996

Merged
neil-marcellini merged 16 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
daledah:follow/74845
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

fix: selected option is announced without selected state#83996
neil-marcellini merged 16 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
daledah:follow/74845

Conversation

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah daledah commented Mar 3, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #74845
PROPOSAL: #74845 (comment)

Tests

  1. Using Chrome + JAWS (or another screen reader), navigate to Settings > Profile > Pronouns
  2. Type a few characters to trigger the suggestion list, then select an option
  3. Re-focus the selected option and verify the screen reader announces it as "selected"
  4. Focus a different (non-selected) option and verify it announces as "not selected"
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@daledah daledah marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2026 04:18
@daledah daledah requested review from a team as code owners March 9, 2026 04:18
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from linhvovan29546 and removed request for a team March 9, 2026 04:18
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 9, 2026

@linhvovan29546 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team March 9, 2026 04:18
@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 9, 2026

Open PR for the review, I'll check the jest test fail later

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d9d831afe0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Contributor

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for product

Copy link
Contributor

@linhvovan29546 linhvovan29546 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@daledah We're missing the role here too:
src/components/SelectionList/SelectionListWithSections/BaseSelectionListWithSections.tsx

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 11, 2026

@linhvovan29546 i updated, please check again

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 11, 2026

@linhvovan29546 i updated

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 93.54% <ø> (ø)
src/components/SelectionList/BaseSelectionList.tsx 65.00% <ø> (ø)
...components/SelectionList/ListItem/BaseListItem.tsx 96.22% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
...ListWithSections/BaseSelectionListWithSections.tsx 75.32% <ø> (ø)
...onents/SelectionList/utils/getListboxRole/index.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ponents/SelectionListWithSections/BaseListItem.tsx 95.74% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
...ListWithSections/BaseSelectionListWithSections.tsx 74.13% <ø> (ø)
...ts/SelectionList/utils/getListboxRole/index.web.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 12, 2026

@linhvovan29546 i updated, looks like the failing check is not related, i'll merge main to fix it soon

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM! @daledah Please add the tests step

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Contributor

linhvovan29546 commented Mar 12, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

N/A my emulator gets stuck

Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp Screenshot 2026-03-12 at 20 33 37
Screen.Recording.2026-03-12.at.20.32.58.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2026-03-12 at 17 42 00 Screenshot 2026-03-12 at 17 41 22

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@MelvinBot add test steps please

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Contributor

Here are the suggested test steps for this PR:

Tests

Prerequisites: Use Chrome + a screen reader (JAWS on Windows, or VoiceOver on macOS).

Single-select list — Pronouns picker:

  1. Open the app in Chrome and enable your screen reader
  2. Navigate to Settings > Profile > Pronouns
  3. Type a few characters in the Pronouns input to trigger the auto-suggestion list
  4. Use Tab/arrow keys to navigate to an option and select it
  5. Re-focus the selected option (the one with the green checkmark)
  6. Verify the screen reader announces the option with a "selected" state (e.g., "Call me by my name, selected")
  7. Focus a non-selected option and verify the screen reader announces it as "not selected"

Single-select list — Default Currency picker:

  1. Navigate to Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Overview > Default Currency
  2. Select a currency from the list
  3. Re-focus the selected currency option
  4. Verify the screen reader announces the selected state

Multi-select list (checkbox/radio) — no regression:

  1. Navigate to a screen that uses a multi-select list (e.g., adding members to a workspace or a group chat)
  2. Select and deselect items
  3. Verify the screen reader still announces "checked"/"not checked" (not "selected"/"not selected")

Native platforms (no regression):

  1. Open the app on iOS or Android
  2. Navigate to Settings > Profile > Pronouns and select a pronoun
  3. Verify the selection works correctly and there are no crashes or unexpected role announcements (the listbox/option roles are web-only)

Offline tests

  1. Go offline
  2. Navigate to Settings > Profile > Pronouns, select a pronoun
  3. Verify the selection UI updates correctly and screen reader announcements still work
  4. Go back online and verify the selection persists

QA Steps

  1. Using Chrome + JAWS (or another screen reader), navigate to Settings > Profile > Pronouns
  2. Type a few characters to trigger the suggestion list, then select an option
  3. Re-focus the selected option and verify the screen reader announces it as "selected"
  4. Focus a different (non-selected) option and verify it announces as "not selected"
  5. Navigate to a multi-select list and verify checkboxes still announce "checked"/"not checked" correctly
  6. Repeat on iOS and Android native to verify no regressions

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@MelvinBot merge main

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Contributor

I can't merge main into this PR because I didn't open it and I'm not listed as an assignee.

To have me perform the merge, add me to the PR assignees and then retry your request. Alternatively, the PR author (daledah) can run git merge main locally and push.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from neil-marcellini March 12, 2026 16:14
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good thanks.


const getListboxRole: GetListboxRole = () => undefined;

// eslint-disable-next-line import/prefer-default-export
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: Why do we eslint disable instead of just using default exports?

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit ba2b812 into Expensify:main Mar 12, 2026
35 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @neil-marcellini has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 9.3.37-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

Hi @daledah. QA team failed this PR with an original issue, "selected" is still not announced

1773389715753.83996_mac-Fail.mp4

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Contributor

@IuliiaHerets Could you (or the QA team) test this with Chrome + JAWS?

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.37-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants