Skip to content

Add jotl#4

Closed
polykrate wants to merge 5 commits intoFluffyLabs:mainfrom
polykrate:add-jotl
Closed

Add jotl#4
polykrate wants to merge 5 commits intoFluffyLabs:mainfrom
polykrate:add-jotl

Conversation

@polykrate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@polykrate polykrate commented Mar 14, 2026

Update memory limit from 512 MB to 2048MB

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added project documentation for JOTL (JAM On The Lisp).
    • Included new performance monitoring entry with associated badge in the main documentation.
  • New Features

    • Enabled automated daily performance testing for JOTL with configurable execution parameters.

polykrate and others added 4 commits March 13, 2026 22:07
JOTL is a Common Lisp JAM implementation. Docker image speaks the
JAM Fuzz protocol v1 over Unix sockets, runs within the default
512 MB memory limit.
SBCL with 128 live states benefits from a larger heap (1536 MB at 75%)
to reduce GC pressure and p99 latency spikes.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 14, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ba3a7d03-e0ca-4743-ab99-5c8abdce77dc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8086412 and 69067f9.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/jotl-performance.yml
  • README.md
  • teams/jotl/README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for performance testing of the jotl target, configured to run on a daily schedule and reuse the existing reusable-picofuzz workflow. Accompanying documentation updates in the root README and a new team-specific README entry are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Performance Workflow Configuration
.github/workflows/jotl-performance.yml
New workflow file that triggers daily or on-demand, delegating to reusable-picofuzz with jotl-specific inputs: docker image (ghcr.io/polykrate/jotl:latest), memory (2048m), and readiness pattern configuration.
Documentation Updates
README.md, teams/jotl/README.md
Root README updated with jotl performance badge and workflow link in the Minifuzz + Performance table. New team README file created with jotl project header.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • FluffyLabs/jam-testing#2: Introduces identical changes to jotl-performance.yml workflow configuration and teams/jotl README, directly paralleling this PR.

Poem

🐰 A JAM upon the Lisp so grand,
Now dancing in our test command!
With JOTL added to the fold,
Performance stories to be told. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Add jotl' is vague and generic, providing minimal information about what is being added and why, lacking specificity about the actual changes (workflow, performance testing, memory configuration). Consider a more descriptive title such as 'Add JOTL performance testing workflow with 2048MB memory' to better convey the main purpose and context of the changes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/jotl-performance.yml
@polykrate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #2 (merged) and #5 (memory increase).

@polykrate polykrate closed this Mar 14, 2026
@tomusdrw tomusdrw mentioned this pull request May 6, 2026
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants