-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
style: make Git blame ignore specified large refactor and lint commits #30661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
| "webpack": "tsx ./development/webpack/launch.ts", | ||
| "webpack:clearcache": "./development/clear-webpack-cache.js", | ||
| "foundryup": "tsx ./test/helpers/foundry/foundryup.ts", | ||
| "postinstall": "yarn webpack:clearcache && yarn foundryup", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
loose opinion: I think gitlens might be fine, but not postinstall for everyone
Builds ready [552198a]
Page Load Metrics (1479 ± 40 ms)
Bundle size diffs
|
georgewrmarshall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great! TIL about .git-blame-ignore-revs :D No strong opinions but left one comment
.git-blame-ignore-revs
Outdated
| #17092 Added storybook check to CI @NidhiKJha | ||
| #### Let's discuss if this one should be removed from the list | ||
| c5368c152b544433a2087597f0cb36b33fbd9c6a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
non-blocking: Not a strong opinion, but since this commit adds functionality for testing code changes against Storybook stories and is not purely aesthetic, we may want to remove it from the .git-blame-ignore-revs file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay good, that's why I wrote "Let's discuss if this one should be removed from the list"
Removed now!
06332f8 to
559c57b
Compare
Builds ready [559c57b]
Page Load Metrics (1730 ± 69 ms)
Bundle size diffs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Also tested in Cursor see slack thread
Co-authored-by: David Murdoch <187813+davidmurdoch@users.noreply.github.com>
559c57b to
b990a29
Compare
Builds ready [b990a29]
Page Load Metrics (1835 ± 123 ms)
Bundle size diffs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i like it!
we can always remove these commits from the ignore file if someone complains. YOLO!
Description
@davidmurdoch requested this feature here: #30440 (review)
Also adds to the VSCode GitLens settings. If a Cursor user could help with the Cursor settings, that would be much appreciated.
We should discuss:
git config blame.ignoreRevsFile .git-blame-ignore-revsinpostinstall. It writes to the local.git/configfile in yourmetamask-extensionfolder, so it's only changing that one folder.Command to get commits with over 200 file changes
Related issues
David Murdoch request: #30440 (review)
Ignored PRs
sassto v1.71.0 #22531