Skip to content

Group host operators into structured opcode#126

Merged
rossberg merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
hostop
Oct 13, 2015
Merged

Group host operators into structured opcode#126
rossberg merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
hostop

Conversation

@rossberg
Copy link
Member

Avoids some spec duplication (esp when more such opcodes get added), and perhaps also addresses some of the concerns raised in WebAssembly/design#362 .

@lukewagner
Copy link
Member

lgtm

rossberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2015
Group host operators into structured opcode
@rossberg rossberg merged commit 8716a6b into master Oct 13, 2015
@rossberg rossberg deleted the hostop branch October 13, 2015 08:36
eqrion pushed a commit to eqrion/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2019
* [interpreter] Simplify zero-len and drop semantics

* Update overview

* [spec] Change drop semantics

* [spec] Forgot to adjust prose for *.init ops

* [test] Update generated tests for OOBs and dropping changes (WebAssembly#131)
Connicpu pushed a commit to Connicpu/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request May 11, 2020
This doesn't change much currently, but the instance wrapper can be used in the future to send messages to worker threads, so they can remain in sync with the main thread.
Connicpu pushed a commit to Connicpu/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2020
After the spec change in WebAssembly#126, byte copying order is not observable.
rossberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2021
ngzhian pushed a commit to ngzhian/spec that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
This updates the explainer text according to the new spec we agreed in
the 09-15-2020 CG meeting and discussions afterwards.

The following are modifications and clarifications we made after the
09-15-2020 CG meeting, and the relevant issue posts, if any:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/master/main/2020/CG-09-15.md

- `catch_br` wasm renamed to `delegate` (WebAssembly#133)
- `rethrow` gains an immediate argument (WebAssembly#126)
- Removed dependences on the reference types proposal and the multivalue
  proposal. The multivalue proposal was previously listed as dependent
  because 1. `try` is basically a `block`, so it can have multivalue
  input/output 2. `br_on_exn` can extract multiple values from a
  `block`. We don't have `br_on_exn` anymore, and I'm not sure 1 is a
  strong enough reason to make it a dependence.
- Mention `rethrow` cannot rethrow exceptions caught by `unwind` (WebAssembly#142
  and WebAssembly#137)
- Mention some runtimes, especially web VMs, can attach stack traces to
  the exception object, implying stack traces are not required for all
  VMs
- Update label/validation rules for `delegate` and `rethrow` (WebAssembly#146)
- Finalize opcodes for `delegate` (0x18) and `catch_all` (0x19) (WebAssembly#145
  and WebAssembly#147)

I believe this resolves many previous issue threads, so I'll close them.
Please reopen them if you think there are things left for discussions in
those issues.

Resolves WebAssembly#113, resolves WebAssembly#126, resolves WebAssembly#127, resolves WebAssembly#128, resolves
WebAssembly#130, resolves WebAssembly#142, resolves WebAssembly#145, resolves WebAssembly#146, resolves WebAssembly#147.
rossberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
alexcrichton pushed a commit to WebAssembly/wide-arithmetic that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
Fix closing of types; fix rendering of nul
stevenfontanella pushed a commit to stevenfontanella/spec that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
Update repos:

  spec:
    WebAssembly@8d6792e
  exception-handling:
    WebAssembly/exception-handling@af287a7
  gc:
    WebAssembly/gc@756060f
  function-references:
    WebAssembly/function-references@74d2ec8

This change was automatically generated by `update-testsuite.py`

Co-authored-by: WebAssembly/testsuite auto-update <github-actions@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants