Move the test suite into a top-level directory.#130
Closed
sunfishcode wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Closed
Move the test suite into a top-level directory.#130sunfishcode wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
sunfishcode wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
See discussion in #129 .
Member
Author
|
Now that we have an official testsuite mirror, this PR is not urgent. |
Connicpu
pushed a commit
to Connicpu/wasm-spec
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2020
See the names listed here: WebAssembly#884
Connicpu
pushed a commit
to Connicpu/wasm-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2020
* Fix outdated stuff * Update Overview.md * Update Overview.md * Update Overview.md * Clarify zero table index * Address review comments
rossberg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2021
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2023
This updates the explainer text according to the new spec we agreed in the 09-15-2020 CG meeting and discussions afterwards. The following are modifications and clarifications we made after the 09-15-2020 CG meeting, and the relevant issue posts, if any: https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/master/main/2020/CG-09-15.md - `catch_br` wasm renamed to `delegate` (WebAssembly#133) - `rethrow` gains an immediate argument (WebAssembly#126) - Removed dependences on the reference types proposal and the multivalue proposal. The multivalue proposal was previously listed as dependent because 1. `try` is basically a `block`, so it can have multivalue input/output 2. `br_on_exn` can extract multiple values from a `block`. We don't have `br_on_exn` anymore, and I'm not sure 1 is a strong enough reason to make it a dependence. - Mention `rethrow` cannot rethrow exceptions caught by `unwind` (WebAssembly#142 and WebAssembly#137) - Mention some runtimes, especially web VMs, can attach stack traces to the exception object, implying stack traces are not required for all VMs - Update label/validation rules for `delegate` and `rethrow` (WebAssembly#146) - Finalize opcodes for `delegate` (0x18) and `catch_all` (0x19) (WebAssembly#145 and WebAssembly#147) I believe this resolves many previous issue threads, so I'll close them. Please reopen them if you think there are things left for discussions in those issues. Resolves WebAssembly#113, resolves WebAssembly#126, resolves WebAssembly#127, resolves WebAssembly#128, resolves WebAssembly#130, resolves WebAssembly#142, resolves WebAssembly#145, resolves WebAssembly#146, resolves WebAssembly#147.
stevenfontanella
pushed a commit
to stevenfontanella/spec
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2025
Update repos:
wasm-3.0:
WebAssembly@50c2e8e
This change was automatically generated by `update-testsuite.py`
Co-authored-by: WebAssembly/testsuite auto-update <github-actions@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See discussion in #129 .