[GitHub Actions] - Updates in Playground Deploy Examples to runs-on Self-hosted runners

[dannymartinm]

DO NOT MERGE until the infrastructure is in place. Please talk to @dannymartinm @elink21 before merging

As part of the issue 21106, @elink21 and I have implemented the self-hosted runners for the Ubuntu and Windows operating systems.

Please see the Approved Pull Request (PR#22703) for reference.

In this PR you will find the following changes:

• Updates in workflow Playground Deploy Examples to runs-on self-hosted runners
  • Ubuntu

PR#16511 : Previous PR for reference.
BEAM-12812: Original Jira may contain additional context.

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @Abacn for label build.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[dannymartinm]

Hi @Abacn @damccorm, could you help us with a PR review please?
Thank you!

[damccorm]

Rather than installing powershell, can we just convert the pwsh block below to a more generic script block? It isn't doing anything that a bash shell shouldn't be able to do.

[dannymartinm]

In general, we are adding the required installations to make the workflows work. In this case, we are afraid that by changing this block of code into bash shell the job may get broken.

As we don't really know the reason behind this PowerShell decision, we suggest to create a new task/issue for this change.

Please let us know your comments. Thanks!

[damccorm]

we suggest to create a new task/issue for this change.

That's fine by me, this doesn't need to be blocking

[elink21]

Status update: reviewed by @damccorm, waiting for the migration window to deploy the infrastructure and request the merge.

[github-actions]

Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @Abacn

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@beam.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.