-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[refactor](join) improve join node output when build table rows is 0 #23713
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
wm1581066
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need some test cases
|
run buildall |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
1 similar comment
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
99380fa to
9603d82
Compare
|
run buildall |
9603d82 to
52b6cf2
Compare
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
HappenLee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
wangbo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
yiguolei
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…llable (#25626) * [refactor](join) improve join node output when build table rows is 0 (#23713) * [Enhancement](filter) support only min/max runtime filter in BE (#25290) this PR #25193 have achieve about FE. eg: select count() from lineorder join supplier on lo_partkey < s_suppkey; will have a max filter after build hash table , so could use it to filter probe table data. * [bug](cherry-pick) fix bug of converting outer join probe block to nullable
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx

Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...