Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
@drcrallen would it be worth putting this in 0.9.2 or should we hold this until that branch is cut? |
Contributor
Author
|
@gianm I don't think anything here has to be in 0.9.2. Or more precisely, there isn't anything here that would warrant risking a regression bug in 0.9.2 this late in the release cycle, as such I have labeled it for 0.9.3. |
gianm
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2016
Contributor
gianm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 for 0.9.3, so this is mergeable now since the 0.9.2 branch has been cut.
leventov
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2016
Contributor
Author
|
This is no longer needed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
super.available()first (Make gzipInputStream attempt to user super.available() metamx/java-util#53)