Closed
Conversation
Member
Author
resetius
added a commit
to resetius/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2016
Revert "[LOGBROKER-1637] save 10 versions of checkpoints" - changes a…
smccauliff
pushed a commit
to smccauliff/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2020
…tocol version >= 2.3-IV2 (apache#75) TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = Cache the UpdateMetadataRequest when using the latest inter broker protocol version EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2022
…= KAFKA_2_3_IV2 (apache#288) TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = The original PR for this change is apache#75. Before this patch, the controller needs to allocate an individual UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder for each broker. This may incur significant memory overhead if the controller has just started, and is trying to send the cluster's full metadata to all brokers. This PR tries to reduce the memory footprint by reusing the same UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder. This is only achievable when all of the UMR have the same body payload, which means the common UMR should use the maxBrokerEpoch field instead of individual broker epochs. EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2022
TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = This is a rewrite of the original PR apache#75. In kafka 3.0, structs are removed, and requests can be serialized directly into ByteBuffers. In vanilla kafka, the header and body are serialized directly into a single ByteBuffer inside the SendBuilder. However, to reduce the memory footprint of UMRs, we would still want the ByteBufferSends destined to different brokers to share the same body ByteBuffer. To achieve that, this PR modifies the Java code generator so that the generated UpdateMetadataRequestData has the following implementation for its write method ` private final ReentrantLock bodyBufferLock = new ReentrantLock(); private ByteBuffer bodyBuffer = null; @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { bodyBufferLock.lock(); try{ if (bodyBuffer == null) { ObjectSerializationCache serializationCache = new ObjectSerializationCache(); MessageSizeAccumulator messageSize = new MessageSizeAccumulator(); addSize(messageSize, serializationCache, _version); bodyBuffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(messageSize.totalSize()); doWrite(new ByteBufferAccessor(bodyBuffer), _cache, _version); bodyBuffer.flip(); } } finally { bodyBufferLock.unlock(); } _writable.writeByteBuffer(bodyBuffer); } ` All other types of requests would end up with a write implementation as follows, which is essentially the same as the vanilla implementation. ` @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { doWrite(_writable, _cache, _version); } ` EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2022
…= KAFKA_2_3_IV2 (apache#288) TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = The original PR for this change is apache#75. Before this patch, the controller needs to allocate an individual UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder for each broker. This may incur significant memory overhead if the controller has just started, and is trying to send the cluster's full metadata to all brokers. This PR tries to reduce the memory footprint by reusing the same UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder. This is only achievable when all of the UMR have the same body payload, which means the common UMR should use the maxBrokerEpoch field instead of individual broker epochs. EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2022
TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = This is a rewrite of the original PR apache#75. In kafka 3.0, structs are removed, and requests can be serialized directly into ByteBuffers. In vanilla kafka, the header and body are serialized directly into a single ByteBuffer inside the SendBuilder. However, to reduce the memory footprint of UMRs, we would still want the ByteBufferSends destined to different brokers to share the same body ByteBuffer. To achieve that, this PR modifies the Java code generator so that the generated UpdateMetadataRequestData has the following implementation for its write method ` private final ReentrantLock bodyBufferLock = new ReentrantLock(); private ByteBuffer bodyBuffer = null; @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { bodyBufferLock.lock(); try{ if (bodyBuffer == null) { ObjectSerializationCache serializationCache = new ObjectSerializationCache(); MessageSizeAccumulator messageSize = new MessageSizeAccumulator(); addSize(messageSize, serializationCache, _version); bodyBuffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(messageSize.totalSize()); doWrite(new ByteBufferAccessor(bodyBuffer), _cache, _version); bodyBuffer.flip(); } } finally { bodyBufferLock.unlock(); } _writable.writeByteBuffer(bodyBuffer); } ` All other types of requests would end up with a write implementation as follows, which is essentially the same as the vanilla implementation. ` @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { doWrite(_writable, _cache, _version); } ` EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2022
…= KAFKA_2_3_IV2 (apache#288) TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = The original PR for this change is apache#75. Before this patch, the controller needs to allocate an individual UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder for each broker. This may incur significant memory overhead if the controller has just started, and is trying to send the cluster's full metadata to all brokers. This PR tries to reduce the memory footprint by reusing the same UpdateMetadataRequest.Builder. This is only achievable when all of the UMR have the same body payload, which means the common UMR should use the maxBrokerEpoch field instead of individual broker epochs. EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
wyuka
pushed a commit
to wyuka/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2022
TICKET = KAFKA-7186 LI_DESCERIPTION = This is a rewrite of the original PR apache#75. In kafka 3.0, structs are removed, and requests can be serialized directly into ByteBuffers. In vanilla kafka, the header and body are serialized directly into a single ByteBuffer inside the SendBuilder. However, to reduce the memory footprint of UMRs, we would still want the ByteBufferSends destined to different brokers to share the same body ByteBuffer. To achieve that, this PR modifies the Java code generator so that the generated UpdateMetadataRequestData has the following implementation for its write method ` private final ReentrantLock bodyBufferLock = new ReentrantLock(); private ByteBuffer bodyBuffer = null; @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { bodyBufferLock.lock(); try{ if (bodyBuffer == null) { ObjectSerializationCache serializationCache = new ObjectSerializationCache(); MessageSizeAccumulator messageSize = new MessageSizeAccumulator(); addSize(messageSize, serializationCache, _version); bodyBuffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(messageSize.totalSize()); doWrite(new ByteBufferAccessor(bodyBuffer), _cache, _version); bodyBuffer.flip(); } } finally { bodyBufferLock.unlock(); } _writable.writeByteBuffer(bodyBuffer); } ` All other types of requests would end up with a write implementation as follows, which is essentially the same as the vanilla implementation. ` @OverRide public void write(Writable _writable, ObjectSerializationCache _cache, short _version) { doWrite(_writable, _cache, _version); } ` EXIT_CRITERIA = KAFKA-7186
rustd
pushed a commit
to rustd/pranavfinaldemokafka
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
Accessor are preferred over fields because they compose better with Java's lambda syntax. Reviewers: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io> Co-authored-by: José Armando García Sancio <jsancio@users.noreply.github.com>
davide-armand
pushed a commit
to aiven/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
This is not needed for InMemoryControlPlane, but will be needed for other implementation.
fvaleri
pushed a commit
to fvaleri/kafka
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2026
don't pass mirror name for followers in target cluster
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just trying to trigger a build in Jenkins.