Skip to content

cranelift-jit: impl Send for JITModule#11773

Merged
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
KeyrockEU:jit-module-send
Oct 1, 2025
Merged

cranelift-jit: impl Send for JITModule#11773
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
KeyrockEU:jit-module-send

Conversation

@honzasp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@honzasp honzasp commented Oct 1, 2025

Send was implemented for JITModule in #8718, but this was (likely intentionally) broken in #10512. This commit implements Send again and adds a test to guard against any future regressions.

Send was implemented for JITModule in bytecodealliance#8718, but this was (likely
intentionally) broken in bytecodealliance#10512. This commit implements Send again and
adds a test to guard against any future regressions.
@honzasp honzasp requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 15:09
@honzasp honzasp requested review from cfallin and removed request for a team October 1, 2025 15:09
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 1, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator label Oct 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 8cf4428 Oct 1, 2025
44 checks passed
@honzasp honzasp deleted the jit-module-send branch October 2, 2025 08:53
bongjunj pushed a commit to prosyslab/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
Send was implemented for JITModule in bytecodealliance#8718, but this was (likely
intentionally) broken in bytecodealliance#10512. This commit implements Send again and
adds a test to guard against any future regressions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants