Skip to content

impl Send for JITModule#8718

Merged
alexcrichton merged 3 commits intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
MolotovCherry:main
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

impl Send for JITModule#8718
alexcrichton merged 3 commits intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
MolotovCherry:main

Conversation

@MolotovCherry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MolotovCherry MolotovCherry commented May 31, 2024

JITModule currently is !Send, which makes it less useful. According to bjorn, it makes sense to make it Send.

I'm fairly new to this, but please let me know any issues/concerns you have with this and I'll do my best to address them. Thanks!

Ref: https://bytecodealliance.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/206238-general/topic/Cross.20thread.20JITModule/near/441536899

cc @bjorn3

@MolotovCherry MolotovCherry requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 14:02
@MolotovCherry MolotovCherry requested review from elliottt and removed request for a team May 31, 2024 14:02
Comment thread cranelift/jit/src/backend.rs
Comment thread cranelift/jit/src/backend.rs Outdated
Comment thread cranelift/jit/src/backend.rs
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator label May 31, 2024
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit b010bfd Jun 3, 2024
honzasp added a commit to KeyrockEU/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2025
Send was implemented for JITModule in bytecodealliance#8718, but this was (likely
intentionally) broken in bytecodealliance#10512. This commit implements Send again and
adds a test to guard against any future regressions.
github-merge-queue Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2025
Send was implemented for JITModule in #8718, but this was (likely
intentionally) broken in #10512. This commit implements Send again and
adds a test to guard against any future regressions.
bongjunj pushed a commit to prosyslab/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
Send was implemented for JITModule in bytecodealliance#8718, but this was (likely
intentionally) broken in bytecodealliance#10512. This commit implements Send again and
adds a test to guard against any future regressions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants