Skip to content

Fix identifiers generated from resx resource names (#2208)#5151

Merged
mmitche merged 1 commit into
release/3.xfrom
cherry-pick-2208
Mar 30, 2020
Merged

Fix identifiers generated from resx resource names (#2208)#5151
mmitche merged 1 commit into
release/3.xfrom
cherry-pick-2208

Conversation

@agocke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke agocke commented Mar 28, 2020

  • Fix identifiers generated from resx resource names

  • Make AggressiveInlining NET20 conditional

(cherry picked from commit 7af51d4)

* Fix identifiers generated from resx resource names

* Make AggressiveInlining NET20 conditional

(cherry picked from commit 7af51d4)
@agocke agocke requested a review from markwilkie March 28, 2020 02:23
@markwilkie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@markwilkie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc/ @mmitche

@agocke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

agocke commented Mar 30, 2020

@markwilkie I can't really speak to any of this, as I didn't author the change. Maybe @tmat knows the answer to these questions?

@markwilkie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I presume you mean the questions in the template @agocke ? If so, answering them with the context of why you need this backported is sufficient.

@agocke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

agocke commented Mar 30, 2020

Description

Backporting Arcade 5.0 resource generation to 3.X.

Customer Impact

Roslyn will not be able to ship on a servicing-capable Arcade for the 3.X SDKs.

Regression

No, although since we had already moved to 5.0, this is effectively a regression in our functionality.

Risk

Unknown

Workarounds

The code we used before 5.0 doesn't seem to work anymore. We would have to rewrite this logic into some other package and put it into Roslyn.

@agocke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

agocke commented Mar 30, 2020

@mmitche @markwilkie One of you will have to merge this, since I don't have permissions.

@mmitche mmitche merged commit cc4af38 into release/3.x Mar 30, 2020
@mmitche mmitche deleted the cherry-pick-2208 branch March 30, 2020 21:08
@agocke agocke mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants