Regenerate READMEs for minesweeper, robot name#903
Merged
petertseng merged 2 commits intoexercism:masterfrom Nov 4, 2019
Merged
Regenerate READMEs for minesweeper, robot name#903petertseng merged 2 commits intoexercism:masterfrom
petertseng merged 2 commits intoexercism:masterfrom
Conversation
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
jubilee-updates-readmes
branch
from
43a3b75 to
3b555c7
Compare
petertseng
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2019
Member
petertseng
left a comment
petertseng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The messages look correct. I agree that no changes to tests are necessary. Thank you.
Other maintainers have 48 hours to object.
petertseng
added
the
sync/readme
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on discussion in #900. I was going to originally add more to this PR but then, after reading closer, I saw there was not, in fact, any significant change in the problem specifications on the test or other levels that required improvement! So, this will do.
EDIT: whoops, reread recommendations, revised commit descs slightly, but should be good now?