Pass websocket Close frame into ConnectionClosed#990
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
/merge |
Merged
jujubot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
#1022 #### Description This brings onto the 3.x track some of the latest fixes from to the 2.9 track. Here're the details: * Fix for #989 from #990 * Fix for #1001 from #1002 * Fix for #998 from #1003 #### QA Steps No QA needed for #990. For 1002 and 1003 please refer to their QA steps. Though they are very related so I'd expect the QA for both of them can be done in one fell swoop. * #1002 * #1003 All CI tests need to pass (there's still some known intermittent ones in there).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This fixes a bug in connection where we pass close code and reason directly into the
websockets.exception.ConnectionClosed, where it needs a Close frame that contains those.Fixes #989
QA Steps
This doesn't affect any normal behavior, as this is sort of a safeguard against races. The only two times we raise this explicit exception is when the
MONITORis closed but either the receiver task is running still or someone makes an rpc call, which shouldn't happen anyways. So manually checking the arguments by the doc is sufficient.All CI tests need to pass.
Notes & Discussion
Needs to be forward ported into 3.x.