Skip to content

Actually delete correct Kafka channel on cleanup#1006

Closed
markusthoemmes wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-knative:mainfrom
markusthoemmes:delete-kafka-channel
Closed

Actually delete correct Kafka channel on cleanup#1006
markusthoemmes wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-knative:mainfrom
markusthoemmes:delete-kafka-channel

Conversation

@markusthoemmes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As per title.

/assign @skonto

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from aliok and devguyio June 8, 2021 16:17
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved label Jun 8, 2021
@skonto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

skonto commented Jun 9, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm label Jun 9, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 9, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: markusthoemmes, skonto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@skonto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

skonto commented Jun 9, 2021

/retest


t.Cleanup(func() {
_ = caCtx.Clients.Kafka.MessagingV1beta1().KafkaChannels(knativeKafkaNamespace).Delete(context.Background(), "", metav1.DeleteOptions{})
_ = caCtx.Clients.Kafka.MessagingV1beta1().KafkaChannels(knativeKafkaNamespace).Delete(context.Background(), ch.Name, metav1.DeleteOptions{})
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@skonto skonto Jun 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Btw we should remove this in the future due to this downstream change that does not require a channel to be created to trigger the deployment: #1010

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure, yet ...
see also: #1010

but thanks for the pointer!

@markusthoemmes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm label Jun 11, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2021

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2021

@markusthoemmes: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/4.7-operator-e2e-aws-ocp-47 ee0a28d link /test 4.7-operator-e2e-aws-ocp-47

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants