Skip to content

Conversation

@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@sg00dwin sg00dwin requested review from rhamilto and spadgett June 18, 2019 20:31
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 18, 2019
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

cc @christianvogt

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

cc @priley86

Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job, @sg00dwin. A few nits, suggestions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moving these lines out of this file breaks our convention of putting overrides of third-party css in a single file and results in us having overrides throughout. I'm not opposed to that, but do favor consistency.

Copy link
Member Author

@sg00dwin sg00dwin Jun 19, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out we are not overriding existing react-tagsinput

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@priley86
Copy link
Contributor

these dropdowns look a lot more consistent to me now, nice work @sg00dwin!

Just noting a few things after glancing at this and starting #1629 previously (not sure if they were already noted):

  • Events and Search dropdown items could probably use some design adjustment. cc: @beanh66

Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 10 03 44 AM

Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 10 01 16 AM

@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member Author

these dropdowns look a lot more consistent to me now, nice work @sg00dwin!

Just noting a few things after glancing at this and starting #1629 previously (not sure if they were already noted):

* Events and Search dropdown items could probably use some design adjustment. cc: @beanh66
Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 10 03 44 AM Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 10 01 16 AM
* The CSS override block here can ideally be removed completely after this PR. I added this temporarily while retroverting the PF4 Kebab in #1465
  https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/public/style/_overrides.scss#L603-L634

thanks @priley86 those dropdowns where missing a rule to control min-width. And I'll address those kebab overrides.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.2 milestone Jun 19, 2019
@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch from 35bab63 to 6f499c5 Compare June 19, 2019 19:59
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 19, 2019
@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch 3 times, most recently from d2a0691 to 8910134 Compare June 19, 2019 20:47
@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member Author

@rhamilto Addressed comments ptal

Corrected Events and Search dropdown-menu widths
Right alignment of kebab dropdown-menu with list table
Alphabetize css rules in _overrides.scss

Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 3 47 46 PM

Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 4 47 26 PM

Screen Shot 2019-06-19 at 4 47 38 PM

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 19, 2019
@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch from 8910134 to 47367da Compare June 19, 2019 21:27
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 19, 2019
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

/retest

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch from 47367da to 222fca9 Compare June 20, 2019 14:13
@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 20, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 24, 2019
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What impact does this have if we change this globally to $font-size-base as we transition to PF4? Does it break the nav/masthead? The dev console team is looking at bringing in some other PF4 components and will have similar font-size issues.

cc @rhamilto @christianvogt

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice if we can override --pf-global--FontSize--md and set it to 14px so that every new PF4 component we utilize doesn't need a separate font tweak.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spadgett Setting --pf-global--FontSize--md to $font-size-base: 14px globally still requires a few targeted overrides. Can we make those global font-size changes as a follow-on and go forward with merging this pf, so the font related changes can be easier tracked?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sg00dwin I was going to suggest a separate PR, yeah. Then we can get that merged separately to unblock the dev console team. It looks like you have some test failures to work through still in this one.

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch 2 times, most recently from 664ee32 to 4254de9 Compare June 25, 2019 13:51
@beanh66
Copy link

beanh66 commented Jun 25, 2019

@sg00dwin LGTM!

@lizsurette @serenamarie125 FYI

@lizsurette
Copy link

Very nice!

FYI @matthewcarleton

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch 2 times, most recently from 27d9f01 to 6d5b4ff Compare June 26, 2019 14:34
@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

looks great!

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch 2 times, most recently from d9a59f6 to e0382c9 Compare June 26, 2019 17:54
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

/retest

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch 2 times, most recently from a557961 to c1b69e0 Compare June 27, 2019 16:33
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2019
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, This will conflict with #1542

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sg00dwin sg00dwin force-pushed the pf4-dropdown-merge branch from c1b69e0 to ca935b2 Compare June 27, 2019 18:36
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2019
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhamilto, sg00dwin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2fc10f8 into openshift:master Jun 27, 2019
@sg00dwin sg00dwin deleted the pf4-dropdown-merge branch December 9, 2019 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.