Skip to content

Bug 2016955: Set AWS Bootstrap Type == Master#5334

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
patrickdillon:bz-2016955-aws
Oct 28, 2021
Merged

Bug 2016955: Set AWS Bootstrap Type == Master#5334
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
patrickdillon:bz-2016955-aws

Conversation

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This commit sets the boostrap node to use the same instance type as the control-plane nodes
in order to avoid failures that we have seen when the hard-coded instance type of m5 is unavailable in the zone.

Setting the bootstrap instance type equal to the control-plane instance type is the approach we already take on GCP & Azure.

This commit sets the boostrap node to use the
same instance type as the control-plane nodes
in order to avoid failures that we have seen
when the hard-coded instance type of m5 is
unavailable in the zone.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 27, 2021

@patrickdillon: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016955, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2016955: Set AWS Bootstrap Type == Master

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 27, 2021

@patrickdillon: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016955, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gpei@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from jstuever and rna-afk October 27, 2021 19:47
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@staebler staebler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Comment thread pkg/tfvars/aws/aws.go
return nil, errors.New("EBS IOPS must be configured for the io1 root volume")
}

instanceClass := defaults.InstanceClass(masterConfig.Placement.Region, sources.Architecture)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we don't need the InstanceClass function any more. But we can take care of that in a separate PR that doesn't need to be backported.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. Wasn't sure if we wanted to keep it or not. Done in #5335

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 27, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: staebler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 27, 2021
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@patrickdillon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.9 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick cancel

Manually picked #5337

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@patrickdillon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of cancel in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick cancel

Manually picked #5337

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I will cherry-pick it on top of cancel in a new PR and assign it to you.

Oh, good. Thank you.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 28, 2021

@patrickdillon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel8 6fc25a6 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel8
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 6fc25a6 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c3e9ffd into openshift:master Oct 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 28, 2021

@patrickdillon: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2016955 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2016955: Set AWS Bootstrap Type == Master

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@patrickdillon: new pull request created: #5339

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@patrickdillon: cannot checkout cancel: error checking out cancel: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'cancel' did not match any file(s) known to git

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick cancel

Manually picked #5337

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants