OCPBUGS-41540: [4.16] add optional schema migrations; default to olm.bundle.object instead of olm.csv.metadata (#1384)#859
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-39458 |
|
@grokspawn: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39458 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@grokspawn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
4b028ca to
a85e3f6
Compare
…of olm.csv.metadata (#1384) * Allow disabling of migrations for bundles and sqlite DBs Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com> * intro new migrations package Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com> * schema migration optional; default to olm.bundle.object Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <jordan@nimblewidget.com> * review resolutions Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <jordan@nimblewidget.com> * use a type to protect migration interactions Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <jordan@nimblewidget.com> * review revisions Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <jordan@nimblewidget.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <jordan@nimblewidget.com> Co-authored-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: c80e8751e716c069017b55279a0f29d0254d426a
a85e3f6 to
ee2a081
Compare
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jfan@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@grokspawn: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@grokspawn: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41540 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-09-17-112842 |
|
/cherrypick release-4.15 |
|
@grokspawn: #859 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.15": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
release-4.15 manual cherry-pick is #870 |
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: c80e8751e716c069017b55279a0f29d0254d426a
some notes about this backport