Skip to content

Conversation

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

After discussing with the team, there were a number of changes that landed in master recently we want to ensure make it into release-4.12. As 4.12 is an EUS release, there are late arriving commits such as risk analysis, refactoring how tests run, creating the etcd/scaling suite, etc.

ingvagabund and others added 30 commits September 19, 2022 17:10
…-move-etcd-scaling-test"

This reverts commit 23156fc, reversing
changes made to d2d4566.
Adding a test case for the bond-cni.
The test checks if a pod with a bond is created successfully, and then checks connectivity between two pods with bond interfaces.
This will be used to submit to a new sippy risk analysis API to
determine how risky the test failures in this job run are. As with junit
xmls, there can be multiple as we often invoke openshift-tests multiple
times in one job run.

Includes a change to make timestamp suffixes on junit artifacts more
consistent.
… and upload.

This merges test-flake files, submits them to sippy, and writes the
returned risk analysis as an additional artifact. It is intended to be
called from the workflow steps that run openshift-tests in the release
repo.
Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
Write test failure summary, and add new command to request failure risk analysis from sippy.
only print the timeline into artifact dir to reduce noise
Store monitor events in artifact directory at the end of run monitor
This was causing the test to be skipped:

: [sig-scheduling][Early] The openshift-console console pods [apigroup:console.openshift.io should be scheduled on different nodes [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
Reason: skipped because the following required API groups are missing: console.openshift.io should be scheduled on different nodes [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel
OCPBUGS-3282: Fix apigroup tag missing closing brace.
Merge upgrade and conformance alert backstop tests
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2022

@stbenjam: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Synchronize release-4.12 with origin

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and csrwng November 10, 2022 18:22
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 10, 2022
@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title Synchronize release-4.12 with origin Synchronize release-4.12 with master Nov 10, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2022

@stbenjam: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Synchronize release-4.12 with master

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title Synchronize release-4.12 with master [wip] Synchronize release-4.12 with master Nov 10, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2022

@stbenjam: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[wip] Synchronize release-4.12 with master

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 10, 2022
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Nov 11, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/test verify

@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title [wip] Synchronize release-4.12 with master Synchronize release-4.12 with master Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

@stbenjam: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Synchronize release-4.12 with master

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

@stbenjam: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn b1dc0df link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial b1dc0df link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node b1dc0df link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade b1dc0df link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn b1dc0df link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/label bugzilla/valid-bug

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

@stbenjam: Can not set label bugzilla/valid-bug: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers openshift-staff-engineers]

Details

In response to this:

/label bugzilla/valid-bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k deads2k added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7b70621 into openshift:release-4.12 Nov 11, 2022
@stbenjam stbenjam deleted the update-4.12 branch November 11, 2022 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.