extensions/Dockerfile: Update to Fedora 42#1808
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
approved
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aaradhak, marmijo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| ## This uses Fedora as a lowest-common-denominator because it will work on | ||
| ## current p8/s390x. See https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1000 | ||
| FROM quay.io/fedora/fedora:41 as builder | ||
| FROM quay.io/fedora/fedora:42 as builder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm 89% sure we can and should, yes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should be OK if we only build RHEL9 now. I think that's the case but I've not 100% verified.
| FROM quay.io/fedora/fedora:42 as builder | ||
| COPY --from=os /usr/share/rpm-ostree/extensions/ /usr/share/rpm-ostree/extensions/ | ||
| RUN rm -f /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo \ | ||
| && curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/testing-devel/fedora-archive.repo -o /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-archive.repo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't understand why we are pulling in the archive repo here. This should probably be dropped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also..
keep this while we are building on the ITUP cluster
we need it while building on the ITUP cluster because it doesn't use a mirrorlist?
|
@aaradhak: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
added a commit to #1759 that switches to stream9 here. |
5 participants
Ref: coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#1851