-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
extensions/Dockerfile: Update to Fedora 42 #1808
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ RUN --mount=type=secret,id=yumrepos,target=/os/secret.repo extensions/build.sh | |
| ## Creates the repo metadata for the extensions. | ||
| ## This uses Fedora as a lowest-common-denominator because it will work on | ||
| ## current p8/s390x. See https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/1000 | ||
| FROM quay.io/fedora/fedora:41 as builder | ||
| FROM quay.io/fedora/fedora:42 as builder | ||
| COPY --from=os /usr/share/rpm-ostree/extensions/ /usr/share/rpm-ostree/extensions/ | ||
| RUN rm -f /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo \ | ||
| && curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/testing-devel/fedora-archive.repo -o /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-archive.repo | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't understand why we are pulling in the archive repo here. This should probably be dropped.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. also..
we need it while building on the ITUP cluster because it doesn't use a mirrorlist? |
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jlebon @travier - should we consider switching back to centos stream9 here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm 89% sure we can and should, yes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be OK if we only build RHEL9 now. I think that's the case but I've not 100% verified.