Skip to content

Add jobs to build FCOS forks of MCD and installer#5603

Closed
vrutkovs wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
vrutkovs:fcos-build
Closed

Add jobs to build FCOS forks of MCD and installer#5603
vrutkovs wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
vrutkovs:fcos-build

Conversation

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build installer and MCD from fcos branch and promote these to fcos namespace

Supersedes #5557 and #5589

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs
To complete the pull request process, please assign crawford, lorbuschris
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @crawford @lorbuschris in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LorbusChris commented Oct 25, 2019

In openshift-machine-config-operator-fcos.yaml we'll need an RPM build job analogous to #5572, stick that into an fcos-artifacts container and and get the bins from there to layer onto our FCOS ostree content to make an FCOS machine-os-content. Am I missing something?

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I was able to create an fcos branch on the MCO repo, but I don't have permissions to do that on the Installer's.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

In openshift-machine-config-operator-fcos.yaml we'll need an RPM build job analogous to #5572, stick that into an fcos-artifacts container and and get the bins from there to layer onto our FCOS ostree content to make an FCOS machine-os-content. Am I missing something?

Eventually, yes, however this setup has been tested with el7 binaries so I'd rather stick to those for now so that rehearse tests would pass before we move further

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

To clarify, what I meant with fcos-artifacts is they come from the fcos branches instead of master. That's why we will need a separate container for those artifacts (regardless of their buildroot).

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vrutkovs: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/correctly-sharded-config 6fa903c link /test correctly-sharded-config
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/fcos/e2e-aws 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/verify-vendor 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/fcos/unit 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/govet 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/fcos/images 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/e2e-aws 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/images 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/fcos/verify 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/unit 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/gofmt 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/fcos/golint 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse
ci/prow/pj-rehearse 6fa903c link /test pj-rehearse

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants